I don't agree with you. A lot of your posts were pushing the limits, and I was asked from people to delete them, but I didn't.
The last batch of posts (from the weekend) were deleted because they contained FUD. FUD as wrong facts, such as "burning ICN tokens will benefit the devs and not ICN holders" and other similar stuff.
Personally I don't think that you have anything to do with the FUD group from few months ago, thus I invite you to engage in a discussion about the things that bother you about Iconomi.
Ok, let's work with that example. Perhaps one of my more extreme concerns (not one I'm fully committed to) ... But how is that FUD? It is a measured opinion of mine, which I expressed, and gave reasons for.
But it's not FUD. It's not something you can say "that is a lie" to. True, it's not a cold hard fact. Not many of my concerns are "facts". They are conclusions I reached by using the facts I have available to me.
If you don't believe my conclusion is accurate, that's fine, but it's not a deliberate attempt to mislead. I openly admit I am at risk of being wrong.
I find it interesting that people have been telling you to delete other posts, though. This really has become a bit of a circle jerk, hasn't it? ... I am, of course, grateful that you didn't.
For the most part, it's probably fair to say you are a good moderator. Probably a better choice than a lot of people here. And I certainly think having MORE mods would be a bad idea, because their tolerance levels might be even lower than yours, and even more things would get removed.
I know of others who share some of my concerns (and more) so it's not the one-man FUD mission that people think it is. And perhaps there's room for improvement in how I explain my concerns but, honestly, I don't think that will make much difference around here.
You can all just get back to the hype, and the moon talk.
Pissing into the wind will only get piss on my pants
