I am not fudding just stating fact the team here never wanted it traded on a major exchange or they would not have come up with two platforms and an erc223 token,they knew at the time this token was never getting listed

  Actually if you know anything about solidity then you will know that it's an easy task to switch from ERC23 to ERC20. All this guys had to do was switch the protocol but they choose to be hard headed and insist that bittrex upgraded their platform to accommodate them. The issue with that is Bittrex doesn't have to do shit, they don't need MGO. MGO on the other hand needs bittrex. so this guys basically flushed a gem down the toilet. Bittrex is already upgraded to list ERC 23 token, cos they have listed a few but am guessing the relationship has been soiled, so they won't bother listing MGO

  While we at it, why is it that when someone question the practice of this team and actually make legible comments about their shortcoming on handling this project, he is automatically labeled a fud. So are we all suppose the play the part of a sheep and mindless act like this token is not performing terribly.

  The platform is delayed and we get several excuses about it, all we get are those prized newsletters. Their competitor Enjin just finished their ICO a month ago and collected far less funding but is already listed on Binance. Will you also use the same ole SEC excuses to explain why MGO can get on binance. Why is it that a coin that collected 53 million dollars in BTC in July which is approximately close to half a billion dollars in todays market only trading on exchanges where free airdrop coins can easily find a home. Can anyone of you fudder accusers give me a good explanation for that.

  Am all for supporting the team and hoping for the best but as a true investor it's your right to question and hold the team accountable for the current state of the project.

  You keep touting the unity partnership, which i will admit is pretty cool but it just means that MGO invested in unity and earned a badge of honor. It still does not negate the fact that everything listed on the roadmap is severely delayed. The coin is trading on low volume exchanges where free airdrop coin can easily get listed and the price is actually regressing in a bullish market.

  All i ask is that you guys hold this team accountable for the current state of this token and stop labeling anyone that writes statements which is actually true as a fudder.

 We all know that the sec rule was just implemented. MGO ICO ended when? that pretty much answers that question.

 As for the Binance situation. How long have we been getting the same response that they are in contact with Binance? seriously someone with the time and wants to investigate should go back and peruse earlier post and get the specific date when we got that first response. One thing i know is it's been several months, however, Enjin just finished their ICO a month ago, collected way less fund (and i mean way way less funding) and its already on binance.

 I know according to you guys am a fudder. But i rather be a fudder than a mindless sheep. It's our job to hold this team accountable. Either way they are good, their funding has quintupled and still rising, our investment is regressing back to the womb in a bullish market. You can either just keep yelling fudder and repeating the same comments/wishes i have seen so many times in the past several months or actually be real to yourself and hold the team accountable/ask for some real responses

man you have no clue what the facts are, in the beginning the issue was the fact trex wasnt erc223 compatible by the time they were compatible the SEC ruling came into effect. once again you keep making yourself look stupid by pretending to know the facts when you clearly dont. that is why it is in deed called FUD.

jack has said a few times now they are willing to pay binance to list mgo, but at this time it is up to binance to accept and list it, once again information you would already have if you took two seconds to go and read, so ONCE AGAIN more FUD by saying dev is unwilling to pay binance listing fee geeze people are relentless and clueless.

really sad ,so what's should we do ,can our community help ourself to hit Binance in future ?

look at the orders for buying MGO on Liqui and you will understand that it is bought up !!!!!

Burning tokens has nothing to do with security. A security token is something that is used beignr a share of company or if that money is used for an investment etc...
MGO is a share in a company. Thats why its a security. It wont be listed on polo or trex. But why its not listed on Binance its beyond me... But hey people are still buying the MGOs so in their view everything is fine... When people will stop buying the tokens then maybe they will realize the problem.

Hello there, I'm looking into this coin, trying to ding the value of it beneath all the troll and crybaby.

Because even after reading the whitepaper and 20 pages of this thread the only thing I know about this coin is that it was created to get capital for marketing GAME and the MobileGo Marketplace.

If that is is only function this coin has 0 value because you just make a donation to promote a project but your have not incentive  into that project (expect if you are holding GAME coin).

So my question is :

What does holding this Coin offers? How is this coin having any value at all ?

Im holding alot of MGO token and Game so stop fucking saying im a fudder. Jack is a nice man but he just talk, he cant do anything for us. Remember that if you lose money, you can get back but if you lose faith from investors you will fucking lose everything.