Warning to everyone. Coins101 is clearly the creator of Bitcoin Spread. As always his helper Karmashark is by his side cheering on his latest scam.
First, there is not a single proof that coins101 or karma have any relationship with BitcoinSpread. Such a relationship is stupid for the following reasons:
- According to you they have gone from the most complicated and rare scam in history (Helium) to the most stupid and easy of all (BitcoinSpread - make a "fork" with the word Bitcoin)
- The creators of BitcoinSpread show a CLEAR lack of not having a clue (they do not know that there are 2 threads of SPR, they copied the old thread and they cloned the old GitHub, they think that the developer is MrSpread) and I do not have to tell you about the technical part.
- Why expose himself as Coins101, that there are people who know him personally when you can create a new account in BTCT, say that it was necessary for PR.
Karmashark introduced Bitcoin Spread Ann thread and as if by magic a new user has created the coin.
That is completely false. Karma did not introduce BTCSPR at any time.
You are referring to this message:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1045373.6400He was offering a plausible explanation of Spreadcoin's price increase at the beginning of the year and responding to the accusations about the manipulation of the SPR price that georgem made about the Helium team in that same thread:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1045373.msg27008946#msg27008946You can see the answers from coins101 and karmashark below.
In addition, two messages later he criticized that same project saying clearly that it was not going to get to anything:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1045373.msg27303936#msg27303936Why say that project (a supposed scam of yours) was trash and that it was not going to get to anything when you could just shut up? To look more innocent? Please...
Coins101 also has created Vtorrent in 2017 and now is going back to pump that now he is finished his total joke of
claiming to create Helium.
Coins101 and Karmashark have abandoned the Helium project and ignore the community, amusingly the community
has a bizarre belief development will still occur, when its clear its leaders have cashed in and shipped out long ago.
The same as before, if according to you they have created two scams with new accounts (BTCSpread and Vtorrent) why not create another one for Helium?
Apart from that, there is nothing to indicate that coins101 or karma were the creators of those projects.
Your theory does not hold.
Coins101 never completes any project he is involved in will go on forking and creating coins until he has enough money
that he no longer feels the need to pull this BS.
Considering that he has never created any project from scratch, your deduction in this part doesn't hold either.
Coins101 never responds to any questions from the helium community, but he will run to his own defence if any accusation is made by Georgem as he is purely interested in his own self preservation.
They can not answer questions related to the project for legal reasons. Karma said it, and I quote:
"...so much of the work we do that cannot be shared here is due to either legal reasons or it is in the best interest of our partnerships at the time. "
That coins101 has not said a "hello" is something that we all agree is weird. That's the only valid point you can have, and you do not even mention it.
Shame on him and his front man Karmashark. Their time is coming to an end and the walls are closing in on their double act. Its over gentleman. Just go and create a new profile and start all over again.
For those that are not capable Zijieli is clearly just coins101 and his gang of scammers.
¬¬
Typical hallmarks include getting cryptopia to release the coin and claiming Bittrex with zero chance of achieving it. Exactly the same as Helium.
The Bittrex thing has already been explained repeatedly, the snapshot could not be done with Bittrex due to the dates they were. In August there was the Bitcoin hardfork and all the work that would entail. In November they had more hard forks and on top of that they had to update something about the KYC (if I remember correctly) so they were quite busy too.
For a coin to be listed in Cryptopia, you have to pay a considerable amount (when the snapshot was less) and they also have to do an investigation of the project.
For a scam would have been easier to say that later would be listed on several exchanges.
Your accusations are not supported by any side and, on top of that, you do not offer a single piece of evidence.
