If miners can continue mining no matter if there are any transactions then what's the difference between central banks and miners.
And most importantly why bitcoin was designed in a way that many of miners do the work but only 1 wins and the works of others goes to waste?

but i think storing bitcoin is not killing it, but increasing its price very much. if all the people will start storing bitcoin then the supply will decrease and the price of bitcoin will increase.

My argue is about the printing(mining) the digital money, if there is no outside force(protocol) to pressure the rules into the system then that system is a central point of deciding whether or not to mine empty blocks and keep growing the chain(securing previous blocks only) or take the extra money users paying as fee, but if processing transactions has a risk of an invalid or an orphan block then it's in their best broader interest to ignore TXs because 1or 1.5BTC extra earned by fees is not worth to lose 12.5BTC.

I always thought that the transactions actually produce(introduce) the mathematical challenge to the miners but now I see that miners can keep mining even for years without a single TX being in mempool.

While no one else is going to process users TXs since there is no central bank to have it's branches to do that only miners can transfer the funds in a sense but if they have been given the option to refuse then only the honest miners wanting bitcoin to thrive and stay operational will include TXs to the maximum limit size of the block and hostile miners would keep mining empty blocks to hurt the network (from users perspective) and care nothing for the end users and only wants to take their share of the market.

There is no more 1 CPU 1 vote because there is no CPU to begin with.

---

For being on topic, dude wtf are you talking about? this is not the perfect world where the masses work together all with one mind and heart to stop doing transactions without exception just for testing sake. you can keep your coins but you should know that you'll never be able to convince every body else doing the same. fortunately bitcoin is not like paper money like if you burn cash it's gone for ever but with btc you will always have the coins in the system.

If there is no transaction happened in bitcoin for a day or week so i think that will not affect bitcoins price at all.Bitcoins price is based on users trading it if there is no transaction that will happen there will be no price changes and bitcoin price will remain as is for the time that there is no transactions that happening in blockchain or trading platforms

If everyone just stored all of their Bitcoins, then it could kill it. If no one uses it for anything, then there would be no value in Bitcoin as a method for merchants to accept it as payment or for customers to use it for purchases. And it wouldn't have value to transfer funds from person to person. I think we need those to keep it relevant. Luckily it is used on websites for purchases, gambling, and trading, so I think it will survive.

We are just assuming only "IF" and most of us knows what will happen if most of us are going to hold. But still I'm looking into to two points, good and bad. Good just like the way I explained it and bad with the way that will kill bitcoin because of there is no zero progress but if there are people that are keep on looking for it bitcoin won't be drop dead easily.

Killing it? I think NO even if you consider it as hoarding. It can not kill it because there are still altcoins cryptocurrencies to used as an alternative. Storing it will only rise the bitcoin price, because it lessen the supply circulating on the net.

It is true if the person hoarding Bitcoin purpose is to increase the price.  But, if all owner store Bitcoin (not spending it even once) will posibly make the price increase for a while but since the idea is not spending it, then this demand will  get tired and be pulled out to use for another other market.  From here, Bitcoin price will decrease until the time that Bitcoin demand will be gone making its value to become worthless.  (Though it would be impossible to not sell if we see  Bitcoin price is very expensive.)

I don't think this is accurate just look at gold no one is spending gold, and yet the price of gold is high, I know it used to be higher but you get my point, if demand is high and no one is selling the price can only go up.