My opinion - this project is well.
I do not know what your problem is to attack this project.
Time will show whether it's good or not - but I do not think you should be so negative to it.
I do not think any project that you do not like about you is a scam.
Leave time to show that .
....... A good project, you say???
Have you checked the previous pages of this thread to see how the OP is incapable to answer technical questions and concerns? How he decides to ignore posts on purpose?
- They (he) don't have an escrow while they promised they'll have one (and on the meantime they get hilariously scammed by a user that offered himself)
- He can't track owners of the token after the initial ICO, so second buyers will never get any dividend
- He has not offered any legal way to guarantee fair pay of dividends
- No auditing of any kind
- No single line of code of their super-powerful-and-advanced trustless smart contract that can link the gains of the ICO with the accounting of his building company
- No LinkedIn or CV of any of the "team members"
- No previous experience in cryptos demonstrated
With no guarantees and considering the behavior of the OP, we can certainly say this project was never meant to be legit.
This thing is already dead, and that's for the good of the community