The terms that Loaded offered are inherently unfair as they give loaded an easy out of the transaction. The terms of the deal are effectively that loaded gets a free put on BU in the event of a fork.
No one acting rationally would accept the terms that loaded is offering regardless of the asset pair being traded.
Which is why Roger turned up just now to refuse the bet?
Presumably Roger was hoping to negotiate more reasonable terms with loaded
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/60ozkh/rogerver_lets_make_a_deal_1_for_1_trade_at_least/Its not about terms.
If Roger was for real he would have signed wallet ownership like loaded did.
its like a dower.
first you show you are for real then you negotiate the terms.
by signing ownership over this 40.000 btc wallet loaded showed he is for real
Roger never signed anything.
So he lost all credit , and what he says is not worth anything.
he did not put his money were his mouth is.
Ver did not sign a wallet its al
"ver said he contacted" etc etc ....
SIGN ownership to see you are for real this is why dower. came in to existence!
To separate wheat from chaff.
I don't care who mailed who , the only thing roger can do is signing ownership over a wallet containing at least 40.000 btc....
the rest is trying to reset coal post and try to escape the subject.
