Share you wealth.

GIVE YOUR NEXT MINING RIG TO A FRIEND AS A GIFT. Not me, a friend. Or even a family member.

Which is trolling me.

Why don't you ACTUALLY try to prove how I am wrong. 

That's not an argument to my point, because that is not the point at all. '

My point is that if we SHARE we can all live comfortably, and if we all live comfortably we can start inventing things and WORK TOWARDS LETTING THE MACHINES DO THE WORK.

And I am not wrong.

You know there is one part wrong there.

Humans...

More specifically, humans like you and cat guy.

We never had the robots before, so full sharing was never an option. Socialism ALWAYS turned into communism, which is no better than a dictatorship.

But robosocialism gives the opportunity for a Robosocialist Republic. And what that means is, a FREE society of individuals who own their own land and property, who pay taxes to NO MAN and NO ENTITY, they just provide what they need by donating the money themselves. If you want something, start a committee to get funding, or fund it yourself.

Every man should have the right to a machine, provided through recycling programs (used machines). And every man who already has a stock pile of coins has the opportunity to be a job creator.

Problem: "Oh know, people are hoarding coins." Guess what, you can always mine them. You could always make your own new one. Or you could always invent a new machine or product that people want to spend their coins on.

AND, if the government needs money: to go to war, to feed people, to shelter people (though there should be people doing that already if there is that much money flowing), then the government provides a service. Ex: Coin Exchange website, online wallet, etc. And things like it does today, like :the DMV, camping at parks, etc. or even (you guessed it) mining(or providing electricity).

You aren't even staying on point. WE HAVE TO USE CAPITOLISM TO GET TO A FREE SOCIETY. Have you learned any history yet? Are you still in school? What grade? I can help you with whatever you're having problems with.

One type of society, BECOMES the new type of society. It happens over time, and while it's happening it seems like it won't, but it DOES. People thought slavery was just PART of America in the past, but we got past that. People thought the UK just "owned" America, we got past that.

And guess what, we CAN become a free people.

The argument is, how do we do the following:

A. Become free (by removing the state)

and

B. Ensure everyone's playing nicely through socialism (to make this system work)

They're in direct conflict; A requires there to be no state, but B requires a state to keep the system in check.  In this case, robosocialism requires machines to act as the state.  Because machines are programmed by people, they're merely another proxy; who programs the machines?  Who invents these rules, and how would we change them?

Mining is profitable as long as there is a huge barrier to entry -up until now, the fact that comparatively very few even thought of doing it. As soon as big capital discovers the game, you'll have 3-4 big industries that have the most powerful machines, located where they can get the cheapest electricity, maybe also in bulk discount. The difficulty will then be so high no one else will be profitable again; since no one else will have advanced enough mining rigs, nor cheap enough electricity; since they will require a very huge effort in initial capital and specialized management to get. There goes your money for everyone.

As it has been said before, our society could probably afford taxing hard (eventually through printing money, and thus inflation) a relatively small working elite, to allow the others to live a simple frugal country life without need of doing anything. But do we really want it?

Would you like to know why?