EOS is a centralized shitcoin, you've made the right decision.

Block.One announced the EOSIO Labs initiative, through which Block.One's innovations and discoveries will be shared with all developers. In this way, the community will be free to get their hands on these open source repositories and release their own products. Block.one’s continued contributions and involvement will depend on wider community adoption of such projects.

The Universal Authenticator Library (UAL) is the "first in a series of repos" shared on EOSIO Labs™. The purpose of UAL is to simplify, for App Developers, supporting multiple authentication providers. This is possible by abstracting the internal business logic of many authentication providers and exposing a single universal API.

Benefits:
• For developers:
   - Simple way to support multiple key managers
   - Increases an application’s market reach
   - Reduces time to create applications,
   - Access to all the necessary functions to sign transactions
• For users:
   - Login to integrating apps using the authenticator of choice
   - Uniform login option that instills confidence while using dApps

Read more about EOSIO Labs: https://medium.com/@eosio/eosio-labs-release-the-universal-authenticator-library-ual-increasing-the-accessibility-of-8e2bd62a78a5
Read more about UAL: https://medium.com/@eosio/eosio-labs-release-the-universal-authenticator-library-ual-increasing-the-accessibility-of-8e2bd62a78a5

which EOS update will be #1 in 2019 2020? 

i am sure price will follow with some important update

it all depends as always on the BTC price
15$ by the end of this year is "only" 3 times higher than the current price, but, it's hard to expect, cause there will be no such a spike in BTC price by the end of this year

Congratulations to Dan on all his sucesss.

‘Dan Larimer Receives Guinness World Record for Most Crypto Exit Scams’

https://coinjazeera.news/dan-larimer-receives-guinness-world-record-for-most-crypto-exit-scams/

Let’s make it 4 baby!

You are so strictly DT member. I read the post I quoted, and red the trust page of that guy, then I found that Lauda (not you) tagged him or her with negative trusts due to his or her bad posts in Bitcoin Cash topic, not here.
And, what is the point of 'would tag you a second time'? Did you tag that guy, then removed tag due to his or her improvements later?

ah, sorry for the typo, I corrected my previous post, it should be Lauda, not nutilda.
I don't know what happened with discussion about Bitcoin Cash between you and Lauda, but it seems that too strictly to tag someone negatively because difference in opinion. Theymos already stated his opinion about this.

No I mean if I shared Lauda's viewpoint on what people should be tagged for I would tag him as well, but I don't, so I won't.


You're here managing to blather on about nonsense, aren't you? You're hardly being suppressed.

EOS: New OP Record
https://steemit.com/eos/@ash/eos-new-op-record