It's NOT a pity. You are MUCH better off staying in ETH or BTC rather than buying in last July. WTT tokens are fairly stable in value, and the majority of miners are still not installed even though we were promised installation in September (and then Oct, then Nov, then Dec, then Jan, and now May). Picking some WTT up now and buying a rig for is much 'cheaper' now than doing so in July.

Eth was at about $200 when a lot of us bought in. That means we paid about $5.50 per WTT and about $16,000 per rig compared to today's value of ETH.

Were your batch 2 Pandas scheduled for September deployment? I also have one outstanding, but did not receive a mail.

Already eaten 5 times my shoe's about waiting on this project. Crypto is evaporating and now me in batch 4, so deployment batch four me is like begin summer, thats almost a year  pfff, maybe its better to get my miner shipped .... and sell my blood tokens.

Oh Chip 1982, you did give me good spiret on GW, but now you also back off. Your right. GW did give us the bumby road and left us out on gaining. I think GW will be what they are telling us, but we did most of the work ...  

ps. what country your from? I am from the Netherlands. Here also high electric, but if i go above 10000 KWH a year its like 15 cents

The biggest problem for me is to take care of running miners. I am not retired yet, so has little time and passion for it.   Even high electricity (10cents compared to 3.3c) is not the major reason, but troubles with mainteinance ad with noise.

I also was willing to take the Alpha miner, nice specs. But in mind that the Panda miner batch 2 are not (all) running yet ..

Pretty risky invest.. again ..

Strange that GW keep selling miners if there deployment timeline is months ahead and do not even have fixed dates 

Not very responsible from GW or i am one of the highjacked customers put on the foollist.

Yes, risky it is, I agree. But on the other hand I heard Andrey saying in Telegram that he believes April deployment is achievable.

Concerning the B3 Pandas: some clients seem to have the September batch deployed already long time ago. So it's obvious that some Pandas were left over and in sum they were too few to fill up a whole pod. Because of different heights GW also may not put them next to S9 and L3. So when the big batches S9 and L3 came in, GW deployed them first. Then came the Neuromation deal and no free pods were over. So B3 Pandas were again postponed to the new facility Ephrata and now George. So we may see the September Pandas deployed togther with the December Alpha's hopefully now in George.  Again: this is only my theory, since the support does not answer any questions. Other theories are welcomed  

I actually made the mistake and compared the Alpha 200 V2 to the first version. But they had a typo on the singapore website.  The grafic card is not the same as originally posted in the shop.

Alpha 200 V1 has the AMD RX470 and the new V2 has the AMD RX570.

So a higher price is justified, but $1K more is a bit pricy I agree.

Looks very suspicious to me.  They advertise return of 400+% a year, which is not unlikely in crypto, but normally no serious company would promise this, because nobody can predict the future. 

Conecting process is under way  

Here is an update on 30 January.
PUD finally powered on pods 6/7/8. Pod 6 - 90% miners preconfigured, tomorrow we will finish preconfiguration and start configuration, and then uploading to dashboards.Few more days. On Friday we will start working in pod7.

-- above information applies to the below pictured schedule.