If you want to get down to this nitty-gritty point, then finish it. There are factually so many adaptation/like-begets-like/simple-change, provable happenings, without even one proof of ETE, that evolution is scientifically impossible simply by scientific probability.
Exactly! There are so many adaptation/like-begets-like/simple-change . . . I call that evolution, changes is evolution! You just like other words for it, but what it is, is evolution.
People often use the word
evolution to mean
change. But most of the time when people see/hear the word
evolution, they think of
evolution theory evoloution (ETE). ETE is what we have been talking about in this thread. ETE doesn't fit nature and reality. Scientifically, ETE is impossible.
Absolutly nothing scientifically impossible in Evolution, in fact I rather say its scientifically impossible not to change. Hammered in stone, unchangeable, from the beginning till now. Hmm
. Why is knowledge, skills, tattoos not adapted
.. Why are you not born a blacksmith, I know you can be born with a predisposition to be a blacksmith, but why are you not born with all the knowledge of being a blacksmith, if its simple a matter of adaptation? Like you are born with black hair, height, longer legs, o-RH-neg etc. If its all a matter of adaptation, why are master skills never adapted? E.g. born nuclear scientists?
What you say is quite correct in the way you say it. But that is not what most people think of when they hear the word
evolution. And that is not what we are talking about in this thread. Here, we are talking ETE.
Essentially, the foundational, universal, scientific operation in everything we know about in the universe is cause and effect (C&E). C&E means that there are no random mutations, because everything has been caused to act exactly as it has, according to the laws of physics, through C&E. Without random mutations, ETE loses one of its major, foundational premises.
The funny thing about this is, all scientists know about C&E. Not only do they know about it, they focus on it just to do scientific investigation. How do they do this?
1. They observe something in nature;
2. They realize that it is the effect of whatever cause(s) made it to exist the way it does;
3. They look for the cause(s);
4. Then they look for the cause(s) of the cause(s).
In other words, the greater the scientist, the more he looks for and uses C&E.
ETE scientists are different. They use C&E to find how ETE exists. But right in their major theory, they talk about
random mutations, when they foundationally know there isn't any random, because C&E penetrates everything that has been found in science. Since they have been using C&E to discover all about evolution, yet they try to include the
random mutations idea, which contradicts the C&E they are using, they contradict themselves.
There might be a few mentally slower evolution scientists who accidentally overlooked how C&E plays into everything in the universe. But mostly they simply ignore their C&E understanding, that tugs at their mentality in every evolution investigation and statement that they make, trying to force itself into their awareness.
Evolution is a hoax. And evolution scientists are the ones who make it to be a hoax.
