Yeah, right.  You stole content that you probably barely understood yourself, based on your piss-poor English, and...eait, what's your excuse again?

Hopefully for us, you can kiss bitcointalk goodbye. Permanently.

This is also the wrong place for a ban appeal.

Nobody cares.  I'm not the one who had to resort to thievery and I'm the one who gets to stay here and post.

I don't even know what race you are.  Stop babbling and get lost.  There shouldn't have to be a written rule that you can't copy content and pass it off as your own AND get paid for it.  Honest people don't do that.

This rule was just made by a member in a topic which isn't stickled at all. An now it becomed a rule

And about speaking English, you are racist sir.

If you want to know what is Bitcoin, how you can get it and how it can help you, without floundering into technical details, this guide is for you. It will explain how the system works, how you can use it for your profit, which scams to avoid. It will also direct you to resources that will help you store and use your first pieces of digital currency.

~much much much more cut away~

sourcehttps://blockgeeks.com

On June 12, 2017, an Ethereum based called Bancor held its ICO. It raised $153 million in 3 hours. No, you are not reading it wrong, 153 million…..in 3 hours!!!

If that doesn’t get your brain melting, then how about this? The BAT ICO $35 million in 30 seconds!!! That’s near $1.2 million per second! And if that still doesn’t get your jaw dropping, then how about this? Have you heard of UET? UET had an ICO which raised $40,000 in just 3 days. Admirable if not particularly mind-blowing. Why do we bring it up after talking about Bancor and BAT?

Well, UET stands for “Useless Ethereum Token”, it is a “joke coin”.

~much much much more cut away~

read full articel here https://goo.gl/erq8ny

The University of Melbourne, a public Australian university, has become the first academic institution in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region to issue recipient-owned academic credentials on a blockchain.

Following an early pilot first revealed in May, the University of Melbourne is now storing and issuing student records on a blockchain where recipients will be able to access their academic credentials on a mobile application. The open-source mobile app, available for iOS and Android, will facilitate students to store and share their academic credentials, the university announced.

Professor Gregor Kennedy, pro-vice chancellor of teaching and learning at the university revealed the institution is “very excited that its exploration of a new way of providing students with credentials was successful.”.

He added:

While we are entirely committed to existing degrees and awards that the University offers, we are also interested in exploring how we can build a more diverse credentialing ecosystem…Issuing credentials on the blockchain is a key component of this investigation.

The Buying process of Bitcoins will have to be made much more simpler than it is at present. All indications point that the process will get more streamlined, so buying bitcoins will be an easy task. Bitcoin is the best one for the future groth and get information. It prices not a stabel it will change.

~snip~
I am asking this because have ran several ads in other adnetwork before and never got any good results.

am asking this because have ran several ads in other adnetwork before and never got any good results.

Try using VPN as it is the best method to unlock your IP, despite if any problem occurs contact to the support team.

Try using VPN as it is the best method to unlock your IP, despite if any problem occurs contact to the support team
TY

I'm sorry but you grow to be incorrect not only in your findings, however in your premises too, wtf. Naturally, you can produce a appropriate result by offsetting one error with another, but you insist so much around the correctness of the math applied (as though it could fix issues or allow you to escape, huh), so you really haven't any choice within this element. I mean the projection for a century you pointed out, not your theoretical instance, of course (you will not get away with that either)Which is b . s . now, so we do not have to hold back 100 years to really observe that with this personal eye

I'm sorry but you turn out to be wrong not only in your conclusions, but in your premises too, wtf. Naturally, you could produce a correct result by offsetting one error with another, but you insist so much on the correctness of the math applied (as if it could fix things or let you get away, huh), so you really don't have any choice in this aspect. I mean the projection for one hundred years you mentioned, not your hypothetical example, of course (you won't get away with that either)

Which happens to be bullshit now, so we don't have to wait a hundred years to actually see that with our own eyes