It's really very unfortunate for ICO bounty campaigners to always be the victims of failed ICOs. All the money, time and energy is a wasted promoting efforts for them. This urgly trend should be discouraged totally. Bounty campaigning might be their only means of survival and interest. Thus, I am appealing to would-be ICO managers to take this issue very seriously and always obey the rules of the game by giving bounty campaigners their rewards after doing their painstaking tasks. A labourer they say deserves his wages! The crypto- world is a world of financial freedom not financial enslavement. Every form of financial enslavement should be discouraged in this forum. Although bounty campaigners are not totally unaware of the issues at stake with failed crowdfunding but their own position should also be taken into consideration. Every business venture has a measure of risk level which can be calculated with all fairness. The case of Orocrypt ICO should be a litmus test for all failed ICOs. We are waiting! Thanks
I don't think Orocrypt will fulfill its bounty promises. I would agree that there should be a consensus on all ICO managers as to what would be their ethics when it comes to fulfilling bounty campaigns. We have waster precious amounts of time, electricity and internet bandwidth in fulfilling tasks and we deserve to be paid. There must be someway that they can be contacted.
