Perhaps this could be done via voting for nominated posts of your choosing... ie. while auditing posts for content/quality (or maybe campaign participants could also nominate others that they see making quality posts?)... Pick the top 3-5 posts that you think are of good quality (regardless of rank/post count etc) and put up a post with links to the posts and run a vote for a couple of days?

You'd likely want to make it a self moderated thread to help keep it tidy... and you'd probably want to make it so that only campaign participants can vote to prevent "cheating" by spamming votes using alts? Or make it so only Sr. Members and up could vote?


ps. thanks for accepting me

There were more users I would have liked to accept, but the campaign is now full. I expect some people will be removed (there are some inactives) in the next payment round, so if you still want to join, wait for next week. If you weren't accepted, it probably isn't because your post quality was bad.

There were more users I would have liked to accept, but the campaign is now full. I expect some people will be removed (there are some inactives) in the next payment round, so if you still want to join, wait for next week. If you weren't accepted, it probably isn't because your post quality was bad.

Sad to see i'm not in, i'll probably try to re-apply next week tough (unless you think my post quality isn't sufficient?)

The bonus would be for someone who besides having good post quality has also posted in different sections

Username: mocacinno
Post Count: 1672
BTC Address: 1MocACiWLM8bYn8pCrYjy6uHq4U3CkxLaa

Former Bitmixer campaigners should not be allowed here. You are the enemy and want to work for ChipMixer?

Funny.

⇦ P.S. I am the only one with ChipMixer avatar + text message.

Username: craZyLovE0916
Post Count: 316 + 1
BTC Address: 1GzCJnu2MTw4RyHXESHxcGdTsMrPDVPp9n