If it's less than 1:1 in the conversion of % Bitcoin growth to traffic/earnings, which it is, then the assumption falls flat.

Speak to the person who left you it an try work it out with them. As for gaining trust just be an active member and you should build it up naturally over time, especially if you're active in trades/deals etc.


Just because companies get paid or pay in bitcoin it doesn't mean it always has to stay at a fixed amount in bitcoin. I doubt Chipmxer is charging the same for their service as they did when bitcoin was worth a few k and adjust it accordingly with the market.


To be honest, I think they should lower it or cap it at something or peg the per post to fiat. As much as I appreciate the payments it's a ridiculous amount currently. Maybe they should restructure how much they pay or cap the amount you can get per week to a certain amount as it could get silly. Pegging to fiat isn't a bad thing in times like these. They could lower the amount to x in bitcoin then the bubble bursts and everyone ends up getting underpaid.

Since everyone is suggesting about chipmixer payment reduction, it would have been better if CM reduce the payment rate while taking in new good and quality posters that deserves/ fits in the category of receiving such significant amount. Trust me, that will bring more promotion, I know chip is everywhere, but more....

What's you take on this?

Re-structure is on-going, maybe (changes to make exposure to other boards or find other participants in the same board). One or two participants were removed does not mean the company is trying to reduce weekly payment budget for the campaign.

I think the company know what they are doing (total budget, payment rate, total participant, etc.)  

Their fees have always been voluntary/donation-based. With more economic activity as price rises (as evidenced by higher BTC transaction fees) it stands to reason there'd also be more users using ChipMixer. But it might not all be 1:1, and seeing that DarkStar_ has merited suchmoon, the participants of this campaign should be prepared for reductions in rates paid. The 2nd highest paying campaign pays barely more than half what ChipMixer pays per post but with a smaller weekly post limit, and the 3rd highest is some shitcoin campaign with $6/post but with an even lower weekly post limit, and none of them are accepting new members.

I don't know if anything will happen (yet). I would not be surprised (and neither should anyone else be) if payment rates were reduced.

Well yes but these politicians don't really know anything about Bitcoin now, do they?

And what happens next when (if)BTC tanks? they will be paying more BTC, or they will have to re-evaluate the situation every time a major change in price happens which isn't very practical. There is really no easy "fix", you pay in fiat - you are subject to pay more BTC, you pay in BTC - you become subject to pay more fiat, which why I think most businesses will pay in the "currency" they earn in order to keep their budget in place since Chipmixer is one of the few companies on planet earth that earn and spend only in BTC it will be hard to peg the payment to fiat, on the other hand, fiat wise while BTC price is at levels is a lot, and Chipmixer can really save a lot by reducing the payments at least temporary, and as Suchmoon said, most likely nobody will complain.

With that being said, and given how successful Chipmixer is and also how long they have been in the business, I bet they are more capable than most of us in making decisions related to advertising campaign budget.

I think there is nothing more to discuss here.
For my part, I am happy for everyone who can be a part of this signature-campaign.
And I hope, that the amount of weekly payment for the participants, can stay as it is, for a long time.

Sure, I would also like to be part of it. Just like almost everyone of us.
But that's mostly why I'm talking like this.
Because if I were there, I would also hope and be happy about every day that there is no downward adjustment...

Do not begrudge the current members! Envy eats away your own soul 

You are right from the bitcoin business perspective, and even from the principle, because this is the way to go if you believe in actual goods with fixed bitcoin prices.

However it can definitely come with adverse effects when it comes to the campaign participants. Because I believe they do feel the difference, and do act differently depending on the bitcoin price. Hell if it didn't cross my mind how crazy rates are right now. And I'm from a high paying country, with a good paying job. Now think about someone from a country with very low revenues. They might earn in a week what a good paying job brings in a year. That brings some kind of pressure with it, isn't it?