That's a false conclusion, bad article, and should be taken down immediately.
All it means is that people paying with Bitcoin are generally paying more per transactions. In other words, they're buying longer subscriptions, on average, than people paying with other payment methods.
The conclusion that Bitcoin "wipes the floor" with Paypal is just plain wrong any way you look at it (with regards to this particular situation).
Where is this coming from? Censoring an article because you get the wrong idea about it's content or purpose?
Bitcoin is very very young, and already it makes up a substantial part of the Reddit Gold payments, that's something to be proud of.
Paypal has has more than 10 years to become a convenient payment processor, and they were beaten by Bitcoin in a few years.
Whether your opinion is the same or not, my mind is set. Bitcoin doesn't require a fraction of the fees Paypal does, Bitcoin is faster and has a lot more potential in brick & mortar companies than paypal does, and that in it's premature fase. While Paypal is still ripping off users every day.
Say what you want, but don't claim an article has to be taken down immediately because you can't understand it's purpose. Or at least change your profile pic to two large S's