or will there be probably an update of core which supports both coins?

To give a quick answer, yes, for me Electrum is the best choice and gives you all the options needed.
Even better, that is the only "non-node" wallet that I have heard has posted in their website how to proceed in case of a hard fork.
Check it out:

http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/hardfork.html

Because BIP 148 nodes and miners will enforce BIP 148 and reject any blocks which do not signal for segwit. If a miner is not signalling for segwit, then they will be producing blocks which are invalid under BIP 148 which the BIP 148 nodes and miners will reject. However those non-segwit miners and non-BIP 148 miners will still mine on top of the non-segwit block while the BIP 148 miners do not. This means that there will be one chain with a non-segwit block after BIP 148's activation and non-BIP148 miners will extend that chain. Meanwhile the BIp 148 miners will have rejected the non-segwit block and mined a segwit block at the same block height. They will then be extending  on that block and thus mining on a forked chain.

In summary,
THERE IS NO REASON TO WORRY.
Store your own bitcoin, never use a website wallet.  Because: reasons.    
Also websites can scam people, exit scam, asshole scam, nice scam, bad scam.  etc

Fork? That's for eating.  If people ate with forks they wouldn't be talking so much BS.
If it splits, you're money might double?  BS.
Your money is safe, the blockchain is NOT going to zero out your coin.

Calm the fuck down!

Hi,

Has anyone seen the error in a Bitcoin QT before when trying to do:

walletpassphrase "passphrase" timeout

For example: walletpassphrase mysecretcode 60

I got a error:
Method not found (code -32601)

The current core version is being used.

I know my passcode, it's valid, that is not the problem, but I am unfamiliar with that specific error code. and why it wouldn't work to unlock the wallet within the console, but will unlock it to send funds?

I have seen in other QT wallets a repair feature.

Wondering if there may be a simple fix or a repair if even needed, to sort that out?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks!

Hi theymos,

Yea I thought the same thing, and copied it from the "help" menu which shows:

walletpassphrase "passphrase" timeout

so still unsure why it returns that error?

weird and frustrating

thanks!

***edit***

also ran a few tests and did:

walletpassphrase "passphrase" 60

Error: The wallet passphrase entered was incorrect. (code -14)


Also plugged in the correct passphrase, and it returned the original error which is weirder. - Method not found (code -32601)

So if it sees that the walletpassphrase is incorrect in the above example and using the same syntax with a correct password shows it as "Method not found (code -32601)" ?

thanks!

I think that something in your password is confusing the command parser. Maybe take the issue to #bitcoin-core-dev on IRC or github.

why it could be splitted? what happens?

There will be no split, if there is, nobody cares about Konye West's "Koinye", and nobody will care about some BS coin made by some other fool either.

Bitpay will use the main bitcoin, always.

Litecoin, Koinye, and other alt coins do not have a huge pool of merchants accepting those alt coins. 

Only Bitcoin is accepted at coffee shops, overstock, purse.so, and Lamborghini dealerships.

Only Bitcoin will be, as it is, as it always will be.

Fancy talk about technical junk with fancy nick names, means nothing.

Your coin will hold it's value.  The blockchain ledger is not going to zero your account.

NO you will not double your money.  Nobody will accept yet another Alt coin remixed off the blockchain of bitcoin.

Larger block size means FASTER verifications.

Why are people so scared?