<<  >> (p.20)
    Author Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable  (Read 67732 times)
    This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.

    • astronyu
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 91
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 04:19:13 PM
     #381
    Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 04:12:36 PM
                         _________          __  ________
                         \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                       /    \  \/\ \/ \/    \  ___     \
              _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                          \______  \/\_/ |__|\______ __|_| 
                                 \/                   \/      \/
                            VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
    CPU:1.72%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [19:11:52]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5            | Block:      32386 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 143.177                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 4.8     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  117.47MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
    1.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.86MH/s|
    2.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 0       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
    3.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.19MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
    1.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
    2.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
    3.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
    [19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000      |
    [19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
    [19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5        |
    [19:10:00]Share: d65fa244              |
    [19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1        |
    [19:11:31]Share: 29f19124              |
    [19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea              |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete    | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms


    On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

    Here i have 117

    You're on hidiff, try --lodiff

  • kleito
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 04:34:07 PM
     #382
    CPU:0.78%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [13:32:58]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 22797.1            | Block:      32405 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 88.5133                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:        1 | Shares: 48      | Rej: 2.53807% | Speed:   77.03M
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 12.5    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.09MH/s|
    1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : Shares: 5       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.47MH/s|
    2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 18.75   | Rej: 0.25 | Speed:   19.32MH/s|
    3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : Shares: 11.75   | Rej: 1    | Speed:   19.02MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:59C | F:70% | P: 80W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
    1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : T:63C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1916Mhz |
    2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:64C | F:75% | P: 81W | I: 24.0 | Core:1868Mhz |
    3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : T:65C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1830Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [13:30:24]Mean netDiff: 21600.9        | [12:53:11][GPU2]:Duplicate share
    [13:30:26]Share: 16c56141              | [13:19:41][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
    [13:30:45]Share: 3066cd17              | )
    [13:30:47]Share: 94c5e99a              |
    [13:31:25]Share: 335f288d              |
    [13:31:44]Mean netDiff: 21884.5        |
    [13:31:47]Share: 66bae883              |
    [13:32:39]Share: 0070d29e              |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:kleito85  | Conn:0d 00:39:50 | Latency:245ms


    is good?


    bat
    cwigm -c sigt -u *** -p ** --lodiff --max-temp=70

    bat conf help me

  • kabi123
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 247
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 04:45:12 PM
     #383
    how to close this CWIgm miner?
    if i use hard way ( X in window) nvidia drivers crash or i lose connetions to gpu...
    i cant find anything in manual/readmy file...

    ctrl+c( soft way) dontwork, Q dontwork, esc dontwork...

  • kleito
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 04:57:28 PM
     #384
    Quote from: kleito on August 10, 2017, 04:34:07 PM
    CPU:0.78%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [13:32:58]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 22797.1            | Block:      32405 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 88.5133                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:        1 | Shares: 48      | Rej: 2.53807% | Speed:   77.03M
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 12.5    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.09MH/s|
    1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : Shares: 5       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   19.47MH/s|
    2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : Shares: 18.75   | Rej: 0.25 | Speed:   19.32MH/s|
    3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : Shares: 11.75   | Rej: 1    | Speed:   19.02MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:59C | F:70% | P: 80W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
    1.Zotac GTX 1060 6GB         : T:63C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1916Mhz |
    2.Gigabyte GTX 1060 6GB      : T:64C | F:75% | P: 81W | I: 24.0 | Core:1868Mhz |
    3.GeForce GTX 1060 6GB       : T:65C | F:75% | P: 82W | I: 24.0 | Core:1830Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [13:30:24]Mean netDiff: 21600.9        | [12:53:11][GPU2]:Duplicate share
    [13:30:26]Share: 16c56141              | [13:19:41][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
    [13:30:45]Share: 3066cd17              | )
    [13:30:47]Share: 94c5e99a              |
    [13:31:25]Share: 335f288d              |
    [13:31:44]Mean netDiff: 21884.5        |
    [13:31:47]Share: 66bae883              |
    [13:32:39]Share: 0070d29e              |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:kleito85  | Conn:0d 00:39:50 | Latency:245ms


    is good?


    bat
    cwigm -c sigt -u *** -p ** --lodiff --max-temp=70

    bat conf help me

    new bat cong
    cwigm -c sigt -u **** -p *** --lodiff --max-temp=70 -i 25 -s 20 -N 10 --mean-net-diff=1.15
     
    good?

  • jenifive
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 390
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 05:10:50 PM
     #385
    Quote from: astronyu on August 10, 2017, 04:19:13 PM
    Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 04:12:36 PM
                        _________          __  ________
                         \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                          \  \/\ \/ \/  /   \  ___     \
              _________\ \     \____\    |  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                          \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  /
                                 \/                   \/      \/
                            VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 382.05
    CPU:1.72%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [19:11:52]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 6000 | NetDiff: 21344.5            | Block:      32386 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 143.177                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 4.8     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  117.47MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
    1.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.86MH/s|
    2.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 0       | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.07MH/s|
    3.GeForce GTX 1070           : Shares: 1.6     | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.19MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1872Mhz |
    1.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:53C | F:66% | P:112W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
    2.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:54C | F:66% | P:110W | I: 24.0 | Core:1864Mhz |
    3.GeForce GTX 1070           : T:58C | F:66% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1869Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [19:08:57]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
    [19:08:57]Target:000000009FFF6000      |
    [19:09:36]Mean netDiff: 20523.9        |
    [19:09:56]Mean netDiff: 20531.5        |
    [19:10:00]Share: d65fa244              |
    [19:10:09]Mean netDiff: 20631.1        |
    [19:11:31]Share: 29f19124              |
    [19:11:34]Share: 53bddeea              |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:spiete    | Conn:0d 00:02:55 | Latency:50ms


    On spmod 5 had 111 hashrate

    Here i have 117

    You're on hidiff, try --lodiff

    is there are a difference?

  • chrysophylax (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3122
    Merit: 1093


    --- ChainWorks Industries ---


    View Profile WWW
    August 10, 2017, 05:50:03 PM
     #386
    Quote from: shubaduba on August 10, 2017, 12:34:36 PM
    After removing -s setting everything is perfect.


    Only problem now is too high stratum difficulty.
    It is about 20x higher above normal value.

    I will keep mining with this issue, but I hope that you will make a step towards.
    Would be great if you lower diff by 5 times or something like that.



    great ...

    one thing fixed ...

    if you are pushing all your hashrate through ONE worker - the diff will be huge if you have a number of cards ...

    you have the lodiff port configured and you are mining fine ... the stratum diff seems to be ok - but it will push pretty hard to try and get it equalized to a decent diff level for your miner ...

    there are many factors that cause this - the aggressiveness of the stratum is only one factor - all machines mining through the one worker is another ... though you are showing ONE machine ... so its hit that maximum diff on that port ...

    more tweaking i guess ...

    im glad at least one thing is sorted now Tongue ...

    #crysx
    CWI-Thread (theFORUM) - https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/1563601 . CWI-WebSite (theSITE) - https://chainworksindustries.com/ . CWI-Shop (theSHOP) - https://chainworksindustries.com/theSHOP.html .

  • zhulick
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 227
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 06:01:57 PM
     #387
    i've tried the usual -p d=x (eg, -p d=0.25 for 64 at the pool) to manually set the worker diff, but that didn't work.

    is there another command that would accomplish the same thing, or is it not one of the settings that i can't control from my side at this moment ?

    i checked the help file, didn't see anything that would do it.

  • ArtG
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 06:10:02 PM
     #388
      VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
    CPU:2.19%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [21:09:41]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 18472.9            | Block:      32495 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 380.801                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 177     | Rej: 0%   | Speed:  316.26MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 38.85   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   52.37MH/s|
    1.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 39.1    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   51.82MH/s|
    2.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 25.95   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   53.46MH/s|
    3.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 26.05   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   52.91MH/s|
    4.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 20.15   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   53.23MH/s|
    5.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : Shares: 26.9    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   51.78MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:63C | F:94% | P:209W | I: 25.0 | Core:1844Mhz |
    1.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:64C | F:94% | P:205W | I: 25.0 | Core:1855Mhz |
    2.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:54C | F:68% | P:210W | I: 25.0 | Core:1870Mhz |
    3.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:66C | F:94% | P:220W | I: 25.0 | Core:1900Mhz |
    4.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:63C | F:92% | P:215W | I: 25.0 | Core:1885Mhz |
    5.Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti       : T:69C | F:95% | P:210W | I: 25.0 | Core:1872Mhz

  • ArtG
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 07:31:39 PM
     #389
    Quote from: khaclub on August 10, 2017, 07:17:38 PM
    I don't know how to download the cwigm for testing. Saw it on post#2 but I don't get it
    you need to PM TS and indicate GPUs and OS.

  • UNICLIFE
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 39
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 08:06:37 PM
     #390
    Stats: -i 22 1070 32Mh/s, 1060 6gb 20Mh/s, good informative ui

  • jenifive
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 390
    Merit: 250


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 08:46:45 PM
     #391
    This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
    Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.

  • cradge
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 12
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 10:28:27 PM
     #392
    Quote from: jenifive on August 10, 2017, 08:46:45 PM
    This CWigm miner is showing more hashrate on software but less on the pool and fluctuate a lot. Sp5 is getting me more coins per hour on pool.nm.
    Switched back. Dont trust this miner calculations anymore.

    Can you show us youre tests done? i.e screenshots, data, test procedure before you arrived to this conclusion?

  • nfr
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 15
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 10, 2017, 11:21:11 PM
     #393
                         ________            ___  _______
                         \_   ___  \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                          \     \/\  \/ \/  /  /    \   ___         \
         _________\ \     \____ \      |  \      \_\    \   Y Y   \  __________
                           \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  /
                                     \/                          \/        \/
                            VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
    CPU:   0%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [06:06:53]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000   | NetDiff: 20466.4               | Block:            32781 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum  | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 118.404                             |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:      0 | Diff:           1 | Shares: 98.25   | Rej: 0%  | Speed:    109.17MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : Shares: 48.25   | Rej: 0     | Speed:      54.22MH/s|
    1.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : Shares: 50       | Rej: 0     | Speed:      54.99MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : T:68C | F:100% | P:244W | I: 25.0 | Core:1911Mhz
    1.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti         : T:63C | F:98% | P:241W | I: 25.0 | Core:1919Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [06:03:12]Share: b53a4086               |
    [06:04:00]Share: 9ac54741               |
    [06:04:28]Share: 5c988496               |
    [06:04:40]Mean netDiff: 23133.5        |
    [06:04:41]Mean netDiff: 23259.8        |
    [06:05:03]Share: 04424645               |
    [06:06:20]Mean netDiff: 23184.2        |
    [06:06:21]Share: 050b4b81               |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:nfr             | Conn:0d 01:00:55 | Latency:167ms


    gpu0                           gpu1
    PL = 100%                   PL = 100%
    core = +205                 core = +137
    memory = +147             memory = +147

  • Boulevard2005
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 25
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 11, 2017, 12:56:11 AM
     #394
    May be pool down again, don't receive coin for more hour, very sad

  • astronyu
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 91
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    August 11, 2017, 01:07:23 AM
     #395
    Quote from: Boulevard2005 on August 11, 2017, 12:56:11 AM
    May be pool down again, don't receive coin for more hour, very sad

    Looks like pool is fine over here.

  • cradge
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 12
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    August 11, 2017, 02:02:31 AM
     #396
    Quote from: cradge on August 10, 2017, 02:26:58 AM
    11 hours running,
    I have not encountered any issue yet.
    I also noticed that this miner is more efficient compared to other miner software out there.

    • tdp 85%
    • coreclock 130
    • memory -502
    • temp at 61c
    • fan at 68%

    Screenshot:
    https://i.imgur.com/BJE4QKI.png

                         _________          __  ________
                         \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                          \  \/\ \/ \/  /   \  ___     \
              _________\ \     \____\    |  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                          \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  /
                                 \/                   \/      \/
                            VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
    CPU:0.62%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [10:30:22]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 14325.5            | Block:      31600 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 232.528                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:      2.5 | Shares: 1511.25 | Rej: 1.08002% | Speed:  162.14M
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 473.5   | Rej: 6    | Speed:   53.08MH/s|
    1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 525     | Rej: 7.5  | Speed:   54.35MH/s|
    2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : Shares: 512.75  | Rej: 3    | Speed:   54.49MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:59C | F:66% | P:238W | I: 24.0 | Core:1932Mhz |
    1.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:61C | F:68% | P:228W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
    2.MSI GTX 1080 Ti            : T:65C | F:72% | P:222W | I: 24.0 | Core:1913Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [10:26:25]Share: 3aa75b9e              | [02:45:50][GPU1]:Invalid nonce
    [10:26:30]Mean netDiff: 18032.2        | [03:50:17][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
    [10:26:40]Mean netDiff: 17903.9        | )
    [10:27:05]Share: e19d06a6              | [06:35:11][GPU0]:Invalid nonce
    [10:27:10]Mean netDiff: 17822.9        | [07:14:05][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
    [10:27:40]Mean netDiff: 17752.4        | )
    [10:28:20]Mean netDiff: 17690.9        | [08:44:51][GPU1]:Job not found (=stale
    [10:29:30]Mean netDiff: 17534.8        | )
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:-----    | Conn:0d 11:16:23 | Latency:287ms

    update, after some tweaks miner can get 55 to 57 mh/s for an 1080 ti

    • tdp 88%
    • coreclock 135
    • memory -502
    • temp at 65c
    • fan at 72%
    • intensity 26.5

  • enkayz
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 298
    Merit: 100

    hashbag.cc


    View Profile WWW
    August 11, 2017, 02:48:25 AM
     #397
    i like the gui Smiley
    hashbag.cc - where do you put your hash? region based stratums available now: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/2044808.new

  • xixou
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 153
    Merit: 11


    View Profile
    August 11, 2017, 04:33:15 AM
     #398
    Works very great with 4 gtx 1070 under win10, thank you!
    Faster than ccminer sp for skunk/sigt.

  • shubaduba
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 158
    Merit: 100


    mine safe o/


    View Profile
    August 11, 2017, 04:44:36 AM
     #399
    I use different workers for each rig.
    According this log, 2 GTX 1070 cards managed to send 1 share in 4 minutes!
    As you see, this is lowdiff port.
    Actually, my cards were not working more than 80% of time since pool did not receive any shares from this rig.
    So actual hashrate is not 58.68 MH. It is like 5x times lower.
    The only way to keep using this pool and miner is restarting miner every 5 minutes so diff will not raise that much.
    Otherwise this miner is just wasting our mining hashrates.

                            VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 385.12
    CPU:   0%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [11:39:48]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 23114              | Block:      33101 |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 55.7378                    |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Solved:   0 | Diff:      1.6 | Shares: 135.2   | Rej: 0%   | Speed:   58.68MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : Shares: 54.65   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.03MH/s|
    1.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : Shares: 80.55   | Rej: 0    | Speed:   29.51MH/s|
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    0.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : T:62C | F:47% | P:130W | I: 25.0 | Core:1883Mhz |
    1.Gigabyte GTX 1070          : T:66C | F:52% | P:130W | I: 25.0 | Core:1921Mhz |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [11:35:10]Mean netDiff: 26120.7        |
    [11:35:47]Mean netDiff: 26167.2        |
    [11:36:07]Mean netDiff: 26303.4        |
    [11:37:21]Share: 765dde97              |
    [11:38:47]Mean netDiff: 26236.2        |
    [11:39:08]Mean netDiff: 26244.5        |
    [11:39:30]Mean netDiff: 26462.3        |
    [11:39:48]Mean netDiff: 26472.4        |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:shubaduba | Conn:0d 03:05:17 | Latency:91ms

  • pr0ximus
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 142
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    August 11, 2017, 05:14:24 AM
     #400
    Looks amazing. I would like to contribute by beta testing too. PMed you chrysophylax. Smiley
    Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
      Print  
Page 19
Viewing Page: 20

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com