I completely agree, I have seen nothing from the DO community the DEVS or from any other research I've done that has actual PROOF that Deep onion is in anyway a scam. I've been watching it for a while also. People are just mad and hating because the price shot up and they missed out on a great coin. 

Weren't people complaining that it's too hard to get into the signature campaign? Then how could it multi accounts be such a problem?

And even if they were, it'd make more sense to risk some multi accounts than to allow some devs to keep a massive >50% premine to themselves.

Of course, the devs as well as shills that join ponzis in hopes of quick lambos would like you to believe otherwise.

But nonetheless, the new rules make this a ponzi scheme, that's just a fact.

Will it be profitable? Sure. But it's a ponzi scheme nonetheless and you're trying to earn money off of someone who you hope will be even greedier and/or dumber than the rest of the flock.

That was a rhetorical question.

I know for fact that people were complaining and that there was a blacklist that was twice the size of the actual participants. I've been watching this from the start and thining very hard about whether or not I should join.

Was going to join when they introduce DeepSend originally, but the new rules changed everything so I'm staying out entirely because I don't like playing ponzis.

This was also my last response on this thread, it's just too frustrating to clarify the whole disinformation which is spread in here.

I'm sure it's frustrating to deal with facts when they don't align with your bullshit. Anyway, good luck with sucking Satan's dick for some pocket money.

someone decided to give free coins, and you call it scam,,, that's not nice.

People were complaining after the first few rounds.  Not initially.  Initial acceptance was immediate after you wore the correct signature.  It was literally instant acceptance.  

Also Blacklist had nothing to do with rejected applicants.  In fact, the people on the Blacklist were those that dumped their onions which was against the initial rules.  Now with the new rules, there is no blacklist and even those previous dumpers can join again.

If the devs were planning an exit scam, why would they show their face and make hour long videos on youtube?  Don't you think they would want to remain Anon?  I'm not saying it's outside the realm of possibility but that would be a pretty dumb thing to do.

LOL, I thougt it is an "anonymous" coin. Now all the information is out in the open....guess what, they lied to you about that  

You lemmings are really in denial and self-betrayal mode. Keep going. Some people need to learn it the hard way.

Sure, there was instant acceptance. But people got blacklisted before they could receive their first "airdrop" (signature campaign reward).

And with the new rules it doesn't matter if people get in easier or not, because you have to invest a significant amount of money to make any worthwhile return. All while carrying a tremendous risk.

And the devs haven't shown their face or shared their names.
The guy making the Youtube Q&As is just a random member that joined and ended up in the so called support group. He's not part of the dev team, so using him as a redeeming factor for DO's legitimacy isn't possible no matter how you twist or bend it.


And it's not about an exit scam. They will upkeep appearances of course.
But it's still a ponzi scheme in which they make money out of those who become aware of this "project" too late to know the whole story, as well as those who get fooled into buying Onions for "staking and promoting" (it's not an airdrop and there are no free Onions) by an army of paid shills.

Premined coin dumping continues a second day. Price is down a lot. And now the lemmings are trapped in that "no move" period to participate in the "airdrop". Cleverly done.