If core still ignores miners and NYA  when building 'consensus' code ... there will be more shit happening - YES.

I would not mind if for every fork I would be receiving some free coins into my account in the exchange that can be supporting the new altcoin. However, I think this whole thing has to stop because it will make Bitcoin look like a joker. Anyway, I am sure it would not really happen that way. One split I think is enough. Not unless we want to make this whole thing a big comedy then we can have a good laugh.

But is it necessary to get a free coins? and that we know that this kind of coins are just a waste of time from the start, I really think that it became a real shitcoin that are only good to dump, well let's just wait for more years to come if this kind of coin can have a real value. and I really think that the split should be enough and regardless of a notable free coins it is still suck to expect anything from the start.

Most miners and Bitcoin economy including exchanges are behind SegWit2x, effectively enought to call this version Bitcoin. But it is likely there going to be 3rd version of Bitcoin in November, because there might be enought support for a new version of Bitcoin not honouring SegWit2x, thus exchanges might list this new coin as well.

The hard fork in November can not happen, and therefore will not happen. There is absolutely near-zero support from the community and likewise from the developers. There will also not be "3 Bitcoin". There is 1 Bitcoin, the rest are altcoins. Bitcoin Cash (aka bcash, aka BCH) will always be an altcoin, and the same will apply for any controversial hard fork.

Bullshit. Just because you slap the name Bitcoin in front of some word and premine existing balances, that doesn't mean that it is Bitcoin.

Another type of attack on Bitcoin*.

No. A lot of the people who threatened to leave for BCH (unfortunately) did not. The people with common sense will stay with the experts and majority.

1) The mempool is empty because nobody is using that shitcoin. It did get some transaction volume as people were rushing to dump it.
2) A maximum block size of 10 TB can't be a problem if nobody is utilizing it. The same applies for the 8 MB maximum size on their chain.

Irrelevant, usually miss-quoted and just outright stupid.

I think there is a serious chance that Segwit2x will not be taken up, and that the miners will feel betrayed and turn their hashing power to Bitcoin cash. We are not out of the drama yet

in my opinion it is not just the bitcoin name it is also building on top of bitcoin chain!
and it will fail or at the very least have a very tough time in the world of cryptocurrencies because of that. there were 16.4+ million coins available (some call it premine even) and people are dumping that and dumping leads to panic sell and leads to lower and lower prices.
low prices lead to low profit for miners and them leaving and their leaving leaves the network vulnerable. of course there is bitmain with all their hashrate which are backing it up, i am sure.

if they built something from the ground up it would have been a lot more successful than this. it may have even be worth at least 0.5BTC right now. for you see mining from block 0 could have meant no premine, no dump, and even regular users mining it. that is how all the rest of the altcoins work so far.

You're an idiot. Why are you still on this forum?

There is no consensus on the 2x part. You can't force consensus changes on the people.

If I create an altcoin and name it Bitcoin CATE, and I say it is the real Bitcoin, does that make it so? There you have your answer. Bitcoin Cash is just a premined altcoin.