@Atomicc, Totally false. Check your maths and then look at how much 1 kH/s/day costs for Cryptonight at any mining rental site (now, not 1 month ago) and how many grft you can turn daily, then compare it to the ICO price. Still hugely overpriced despite higher diff.

Opening mining during ICO was the first sign that it's a scam, then pricing the ICO at 10x the price via mining (why would anyone buy in the ICO instead of renting hashpower?) kind of sealed it. I feel sorry for those who bought ICO coins. But then again, this is crypto ... victims are a necessity for success.

  what profitability? the coin doesn't exist on any exchange and you have no idea what actual value it will have when it hits exchanges.

All you can say is that even now (higher diff), mining it using rented hashpower is FAR cheaper than the ICO price, and it was even cheaper mining it during the ICO. If you don't admit that the ICO was shady because of this, then you likely have hidden interests or could be a (potential) victim yourself. Nobody should have bought in this ICO. At best, they should have rented hashpower and mined it instead (and then pray they don't miss the dump of all miners selling when/if it hits exchanges).

You're a fan. I get it. Doesn't change the list of shady stuff I highlighted https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/2115188.msg30565779#msg30565779 ... for example, can you name just 3 verifiable (and worthy) companies from the 140+40 they claim they partnered with?

We're all tired of scammers. If you want people to know about GRAFT, then tell them about the above as well.

p.s. What communication? The telegram chat is a ghost town as far as team members are concerned ... it's full of incredibly rude supporters and miners.

Have a look at the ICO page:

- outrageously overpriced ICO (mining it is orders of magnitude cheaper, why would anyone want to buy in the ICO?)
- unsuccessful ICO (92 mil available to sell, only 22 mil sold) ... no surprise here. In fact, 22 mil is already too much.
- a hell of a lot of coins go to the team in some form (4+8+27% reserves - seriously?)
- mentions ICO cap in USD, but ICO priced in BTC.
- a long series of unverifiable (surreal?) claims, e.g. claims to have already achieved: 140 merchants for the mobile wallet, 40 partners on terminal integration, etc ... Wow, and this coin isn't even on any exchange. Why do you think they don't name any single one of those merchants/partners? (rhetorical question)
- team put forward a pool with 0.01% fee because "we want to help the community, we don't want money for ourselves". When their pool reached a few MH/s, guess what happened to that 0.01% fee? It became 1%.

Good luck to those who actually bought in this ICO.

p.s. Has anyone asked all advisors about it (scammy ICOs slap on names all the time)? Though this looks like a Ukraine get-together, international footprint is minimal at best.

It has been another wild experience of going through the ICO over the last 4 weeks! We are thankful to our supporters and contributors. Now, as GRAFT Blockchain ICO is over we can continue with GRAFT's ambitious mission.

how much will coin cost as a final user ?