Actually people are not easy at all to digest that tweet which nailed the project's credibility. They should have been very transparent and careful because it is only reputation in any business specially these altcoins markets where a small mistake can be fatal. I still am watching what is going to be next.
People overreact all the time in cryptoworld, and western world investors are EXTREMELY sensitive, but if you want to nitpick about the flaws of a project you can do that with almost any project.
The twitter incident to me was no different than any other real world business that has an employee that gives the business bad press. Sure it's not a good look for a business, but that one person does not individually determine the success/failure of the business, especially with something as insignificant as a TWITTER GIVEAWAY
...
Most of these issues always pass, and for every investor that leaves over the twitter experience, there will be another investor that replaces you in the years to come that probably won't ever even find out about the twitter incident. Why? Because in the huge scope of things, that giveaway incident while bad, is small.
That's exactly why, WTC is still out there creating partnerships like the Alibaba one, why? Because the Alibaba Cloud juggernaut could care less about some measley WTC giveaway that went wrong, that's if they even know (or care to know ) about it
Wake me up when team starts LOSING partnerships behind things they are doing, OR something serious like a rogue developer trying to sabotage the codebase of the WTC blockchain. Until then, you can be silly if you want, WTC ain't going nowhere, and what alot of people on here fail to realize is that WTC doesn't even need to go out of their way to appease the western world. I'm not condoning bad actions, but from a marketing/community standpoint WTC has come a LOOONG way and people should be grateful instead of just always finding the smallest thing to complain about to jump ship.
