 |
October 29, 2017, 04:22:49 PM |
|
Quote from whitepaper:
"In the offering period, investor Alice purchases 30,000,000 NTZ for 1,000 ETH (33% discount). The offering period ends with a total of 5,000 ETH raised. ● According to the graph, with 5,000 ETH raised, 70,000 ABP (10%) is issued in addition to the existing 630,000 ABP before the event. ● In the power-up period, Alice converts all of her 30,000,000 NTZ into ABP, receiving 14,000 ABP (2% of the issued ABP)."
Shouldn't Alice receive 20% of the issued ABP? (she spent 1000 ETH, 5000 ETH total were raised, so she contributed 20%)
The value of ABP will depend only on the price of NTZ, because when powering down you receive the exact same amount that you used to power up? (and ABP can't be traded)
How is the profit part dividend returned? In additional NTZ? Very unclear in the whitepaper.
Is the amount of ABP that could be issued in power events capped in any way?
It's an interesting project and I like the idea of having a token that is stable in value, because your funds for playing poker aren't meant to be a risky investment, but I don't really see why ABP should be suited for investors and why NTZ would be riskless, if ABP value depends on NTZ price. NTZ seems to be a risky asset and ABP seems to be just NTZ with some extra steps. The way I understood it, NTZ would fluctuate in price just as any other coin, because it determines ABP price which is bound to be volatile because of the dividend. It would simply fluctuate in a more controlled way because of the market maker contract. But if interest in ABP rises and people start to value ABP higher, demand for NTZ rises, because it is needed to convert to ABP, forcing a change in the set prices of the MM contract. Same goes for depreciation.
Another question is, if people buy say 1,000,000,000 NTZ just as funds for playing, and issued ABP is say 1,000,000 and outstanding ABP is 800,000, then how much NTZ needs to be powered up to receive 1 ABP?
I hope I am mistaken and someone can clarify these issues.
Thanks
|