"Unhandled" means that every moderator with jurisdiction over the post was unsure about the correct thing to do with the post and so left it for other mods to deal with, but no mod ever decided to act on it. I suppose it can be thought of as a "weak bad", though it's ignored for your accuracy percentage.
I'm curious: what makes grv's reports so different from the rest that moderators can't decide on 63% of his reports?
Last 120 days:
+---------------------+------+-----+-----------+----------+
| realName | good | bad | unhandled | accuracy |
+---------------------+------+-----+-----------+----------+
| grv | 306 | 6 | 540 | 0.9808 |
+---------------------+------+-----+-----------+----------+
I made 19 reports to the moderator in last 7 days and out of the 19 around 92% are correct which doesn't make any sense as if you calculate 92% of 19 it makes 17.48 how and who is going to justify that now.
92% of 19 = 17.48
Could it be 12 good reports, 1 bad, and 6 unhandled?
12/13 makes 92% accuracy.
Not necessarily. In the right threads you're required to post that as they're often on a 'first-come-first-served' basis. However, the people who spam "reserved" in every thread should be banned (often in ANN thread even though you're not supposed to do that).
If reserved isn't allowed anymore, they'll just switch to asking for a bounty.
With "signature contest" I though the user meant 'bounty campaigns' et. al., but now I'm thinking he/she may be talking about signature design contests. I'm torn.
My giveaway contests got "reserved"-posts too, even though the Rules say not to edit posts. More people should start their topic self-moderated, in my thread that delete button basically ended all spam once spammers realize it's useless.
I must admit I sometimes click "Report" just to check my own statistics. I'm a bit OCD with it now, since I lost 5 of my very first reports to being "bad", I've had a flawless record. I should probably stop worrying about that, and report posts that I have doubts about too.