Thanks for your replies. I didnt know that steemit was a non-reliable source. Thanks for that. Ive googled the info and there is another site saying the same as the steeemit article but in this case linking to the article of the FT:
https://www.ft.com/content/d175fc82-76a7-11e7-90c0-90a9d1bc9691After reading the article, I can say that stating that people are getting into mortgage debt to invest in cryptos is really biased. The only think that could point to cryptos is the following:
Wealthy homeowners are borrowing against their property to invest in bonds, equities, alternative investments or commercial property as the low cost of debt creates opportunities for mortgage arbitrage.
So, alternative investments could point to cryptos but it could also point somewhere else.
It is a bad way of investing anyway, no matter if you do it to invest in cryptos or the stock market.
you can never say if it is good or bad. maybe some people prefer this way of trading. some people are naturally high-risk-takers. they enjoy the risk itself! sometimes it works and that huge risk gives them a huge reward, sometimes it doesn't work and their whole life is ruined.
the question is how someone who is doing such a thing is handling the risks and what are his/her plans for each scenario in case something went wrong. for example can they pay back the mortgage if they lose it all in trading? if yes, then i don't really see any issue with something like that
if they can accept the risks.