>> (p.1)
    Author Topic: Start Using mBTC as Standard Denomination?  (Read 30924 times)

    • Razick (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1330
    Merit: 1008


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 04:09:32 PM
    Last edit: June 02, 2013, 05:51:46 PM by Razick
     #1
    EDIT: I answered a few questions on the topic for a CoinDesk article: http://www.coindesk.com/june-2-m-day-promotes-millibitcoin-as-unit-of-choice/

    EDIT2: As of today I will be using mBTC whenever appropriate. I encourage you to do the same. Also, many clients/wallets have built in support for mBTC so be sure to change it over. Blockchain and Bitcoin QT included.

    Now that Bitcoin's price is (relatively speaking) stable and shows no signs of any major decline in the near future, I think it is time to take a look at how we measure it. At the current price of ~$130, BTC is a little awkward to work with: If I wanted to buy something for $3.99 in Bitcoin, I'd have to pay BTC0.03069. That's an unattractive way of pricing things.

    If, however, we made mBTC the default "denomination of reference" a few things would happen:

    - Prices would be easier to work with, BTC0.03069 would become mBTC30.69. Much better (note the precision is the same).
    - Bitcoin's exchange rate would be (seem) more attractive to newcomers. Many of which find $130 questionable because they don't understand the market.
    - Newcomers wouldn't keep asking about why there are only 21,000,000 units, since there would obviously be 21,000,000,000. Plenty for now.

    What do you think?

    NEW OPTION:

    Switch to XBT. An XBT is 100 satoshi (or 1/1,000,000 BTC). This allows us to have $21,000,000,000,000 units of the base unit of currency, and an exchange rate much less threatening to newcomers.
    ACCOUNT RECOVERED 4/27/2020. Account was previously hacked sometime in 2017. Posts between 12/31/2016 and 4/27/2020 are NOT LEGITIMATE.

  • eMansipater
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 294
    Merit: 273



    View Profile WWW
    May 30, 2013, 04:15:14 PM
     #2
    zinodaur put it better than me:
    If you found my post helpful, feel free to send a small tip to 1QGukeKbBQbXHtV6LgkQa977LJ3YHXXW8B
    Visit the BitCoin Q&A Site to ask questions or share knowledge.
    0.009 BTC too confusing?  Use mBTC instead!  Details at www.em-bit.org or visit the project thread to help make Bitcoin prices more human-friendly.

  • Birdy
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 364
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 04:21:59 PM
     #3
    Absolutely, mBtc would be the better unit to get more people interested in Bitcoins.
    It's just a psychological effect, but a huge one.

  • Razick (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1330
    Merit: 1008


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 04:23:23 PM
     #4
    Quote from: Birdy on May 30, 2013, 04:21:59 PM
    Absolutely, mBtc would be the better unit to get more people interested in Bitcoins.
    It's just a psychological effect, but a huge one.
    Quote from: eMansipater on May 30, 2013, 04:15:14 PM
    zinodaur put it better than me:



    +1 Just fyi, I have already made the switch where possible. If this poll get's support I am going to start a petition to send to BitPay. Just to clarify the petition would ask for the option to use mBTC so it wouldn't force a switch.
    ACCOUNT RECOVERED 4/27/2020. Account was previously hacked sometime in 2017. Posts between 12/31/2016 and 4/27/2020 are NOT LEGITIMATE.

  • axefrog
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 28
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 04:32:48 PM
     #5
    As I said in another thread, the word "coin" here is the problem. People see coins as small, semi-worthless denominations of a larger unit, and they also see them as somewhat non-divisible, at least not by a significant amount. It's not really in anybody's reality that you can divide a coin up to eight decimal places, so by having individual coins worth $130+, a psychological barrier is thrown up which creates resistance to adoption.

    I propose that we retarget the word "Bitcoin" at smaller denominations, and perhaps start assigning (colloquially at least) the word BitDollar, or something else, to the denomination currently used by Bitcoin. By doing this, people will feel like what they are exchanging their fiat currency for has more actual value. I feel this is a better solution than simply defaulting to "mBTC", as mBTC is (a) a mouthful and (b) still appears to be a tiny subdivision of a greater whole, which doesn't address the psychological barrier issue.

  • Razick (OP)
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1330
    Merit: 1008


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 04:41:28 PM
     #6
    Quote from: axefrog on May 30, 2013, 04:32:48 PM
    As I said in another thread, the word "coin" here is the problem. People see coins as small, semi-worthless denominations of a larger unit, and they also see them as somewhat non-divisible, at least not by a significant amount. It's not really in anybody's reality that you can divide a coin up to eight decimal places, so by having individual coins worth $130+, a psychological barrier is thrown up which creates resistance to adoption.

    I propose that we retarget the word "Bitcoin" at smaller denominations, and perhaps start assigning (colloquially at least) the word BitDollar, or something else, to the denomination currently used by Bitcoin. By doing this, people will feel like what they are exchanging their fiat currency for has more actual value. I feel this is a better solution than simply defaulting to "mBTC", as mBTC is (a) a mouthful and (b) still appears to be a tiny subdivision of a greater whole, which doesn't address the psychological barrier issue.

    I see your point, but I think that would be pretty controversial. mBTC is a mouthful, but if we could come up with an alternative term for it (similar to how 1000th of $1 is a mill), it wouldn't be a problem. I think mBTC is simple enough, after all, even in the US people are taught decimal based measurements in school so just about everyone understands them.

    We just have to make sure we don't end up saying "10 mee" like how the British use "10 pee."  Wink
    ACCOUNT RECOVERED 4/27/2020. Account was previously hacked sometime in 2017. Posts between 12/31/2016 and 4/27/2020 are NOT LEGITIMATE.

  • tutkarz
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 546
    Merit: 501


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 04:45:24 PM
     #7
    Quote from: axefrog on May 30, 2013, 04:32:48 PM
    As I said in another thread, the word "coin" here is the problem. People see coins as small, semi-worthless denominations of a larger unit, and they also see them as somewhat non-divisible, at least not by a significant amount. It's not really in anybody's reality that you can divide a coin up to eight decimal places, so by having individual coins worth $130+, a psychological barrier is thrown up which creates resistance to adoption.

    I propose that we retarget the word "Bitcoin" at smaller denominations, and perhaps start assigning (colloquially at least) the word BitDollar, or something else, to the denomination currently used by Bitcoin. By doing this, people will feel like what they are exchanging their fiat currency for has more actual value. I feel this is a better solution than simply defaulting to "mBTC", as mBTC is (a) a mouthful and (b) still appears to be a tiny subdivision of a greater whole, which doesn't address the psychological barrier issue.
    this is good idea but almost impossible to convince everybody to use and don't confuse too much everyone.
    Don't worry about anything at all

  • The 4ner
    aka newbitcoinqtuser
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 602
    Merit: 500


    R.I.P Silk Road 1.0


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 05:24:31 PM
     #8
    So that's what M-Day was referring to! Ha ha!

  • RoadToHell
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 260
    Merit: 250



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 05:30:39 PM
     #9
    Quote from: The 4ner on May 30, 2013, 05:24:31 PM
    So that's what M-Day was referring to! Ha ha!
    Oops - someone took the bag off the cat!
    Sam Spade: We were talking about a lot more money than this.
    Kasper Gutman: Yes, sir, we were, but this is genuine coin of the realm. With a dollar of this, you can buy ten dollars of talk.

  • acoindr
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1050
    Merit: 1002


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 05:35:31 PM
     #10
    Fantastic!

    I think m-Day could be huge. All we need is MtGox on board. As I said earlier:

    Quote from: acoindr on May 07, 2013, 03:58:57 PM
    ... Second, I do think we should make a concerted push toward mBTC (we shouldn't skip all the way to Satoshis).

    Newer people will not know that we had a large discussion about moving the decimal place early in this forum's and Bitcoin's life. Some of the exact same reasoning about perception being key was brought up, including by myself. In fact, if you look at the chart on this page you will see there was one weird spike in Bitcoin's price history where it went from around $1 to $30 and back to around $1-2 in a short timespan. Guess what. That spike, if you look at this forum's history, corresponded with discussing moving the decimal place in a concerted way. People understood that if 1 mBTC reached dollar parity then owning whole bitcoins would mean a lot of value (1 thousand times more, to be precise), and the price shot up, then crashed.

    We mostly didn't move the decimal place. I think because it wouldn't have made sense. We had only recently reached dollar parity, giving Bitcoin that crucial credibility boost. It wouldn't make sense to hide that by referring to everything with mBTC which would then be worth about $.001. Now, however, things are different. We've reached $100, and I think perception is one reason we're sort of stuck there. If we go to mBTC now they would be worth $0.10 each approx, which is easy to comprehend.

    I think we need to push the exchanges to do this. If they do so everyone else will follow.

  • keelba
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 104
    Merit: 10



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 06:02:03 PM
     #11
    Quote from: axefrog on May 30, 2013, 04:32:48 PM
    As I said in another thread, the word "coin" here is the problem. People see coins as small, semi-worthless denominations of a larger unit, and they also see them as somewhat non-divisible, at least not by a significant amount.

    I agree with your reasoning but I believe it is the "Bit" portion that is giving people the perception of "small, semi-worthless". I'd rather not see names like Bitcent, or millibit, or anything with "bit" in it. I like the idea of naming the denominations after those who've contributed to getting Bitcoin off the ground. Like 1 mBTC could be called a Gavin. I don't really care if it is called a Gavin, just want a unique name not associated with the word bit.

    And I agree, no one should ever see the price of 1 BTC at $1,000. We should be dealing with smaller denominations before that happens.

  • tlr
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 86
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 06:31:09 PM
     #12
    I agree mBTC is kind of awkward. It's 4 syllables, and it isn't obviously related to Bitcoin unless you already know what BTC means.

    Ideally we'd use something that's 1-3 syllables, and is obviously related to Bitcoin.

    "Bitdollar" seems counter-intuitive since it's less than a bitcoin, but would be relatively close in value to USD... for now.

    "Millicoin" sounds like a tiny amount, otherwise I like it. It extends to "Microcoin" if we're ever fortunate enough to have that problem.

  • Tacticat
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 06:36:46 PM
     #13
    How about MBC? Mili Bitcoin

    Or maybe just "Milicoin".
    Tips and donations:

    15nqQGfkgoxrBnsshD6vCuMWuz71MK51Ug

  • TippingPoint
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 905
    Merit: 1000



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 06:37:56 PM
     #14
    The word Bond might have potential.

  • Abdussamad
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 3880
    Merit: 1648



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 06:43:57 PM
     #15
    What does the m stand for? Milli or micro?

    I find it confusing and would rather use a decimal point than worry about mBTC.

  • TippingPoint
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 905
    Merit: 1000



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 06:51:36 PM
    Last edit: May 30, 2013, 07:06:44 PM by TippingPoint
     #16
    From a subliminal, mass-marketing standpoint, "bit" is sometimes associated with something small, fractional, and insignificant, and "coin" is most commonly associated with a fraction of a dollar, franc, or peso.  

    It is like being named Trevor or Agnes.

    Although it is probably too late to do anything about it.

    car names
    http://carzz.co/designbook/375/ten-of-the-worst-car-names/
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-drive/car-life/best-and-worst-weird-wacky-and-wonderful-car-names/article12220424/

  • blacksmithtm
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 87
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 07:00:02 PM
     #17
    Why isnt there a "i support another denomination" option

  • The 4ner
    aka newbitcoinqtuser
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 602
    Merit: 500


    R.I.P Silk Road 1.0


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 07:00:51 PM
     #18
    Quote from: TippingPoint on May 30, 2013, 06:51:36 PM
    It is like being named Trevor or Agnes.

    LOL! I'm sure there are some Trevor's and Agnes' out there that like their name. Ha ha!

  • kendog77
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 742
    Merit: 500


    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 07:01:20 PM
     #19
    The easiest way to force adoption of such a change would be to simply change the default units in the next bitcoin-qt release from BTC to mBTC.

    Most people would not change the default and get used to dealing with mBTC.

  • Tacticat
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 210
    Merit: 100



    View Profile
    May 30, 2013, 07:09:08 PM
     #20
    What do you prefer?

    10 mbc (milibitcoin)
    10 mBTC
    10 milis
    10 milcoins
    Other...

    I really like 1 mbc, in lowercase also indicates that it's a subunit.
    Tips and donations:

    15nqQGfkgoxrBnsshD6vCuMWuz71MK51Ug
    Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 »  All
      Print  
Page 1
Viewing Page: 1

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com