<<  >> (p.198)
    Author Topic: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)  (Read 530991 times)

    • robinson5
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    October 31, 2014, 06:22:59 PM
     #3941
    Quote from: K1773R on October 31, 2014, 12:01:24 AM
    Current Status (including past) on Craptsy

    - They created non-standard transactions (bigger than 100KB)
    - I mined their transactions for free, for quite some time.
    - They have stolen ~0.9 BTC in the meantime from me in a "waiting game".
    - They fail to broadcast transcations, offered them to mine those transactions, if they send me the raw transaction.
    - Craptsy (or anyone else) never gave me with a raw transaction to mine.

    Hence im now done with craptsy. No more mining of their non-standard transaction.
    Tickets on issues are just closed, blatantly ignored or im told "its in process/your on a list", tough there's nothing that needs weeks of work (its just a missing withdrawal).
    Unless this gets resolved, i wont help craptsy nor anyone who uses it again (including myself of course).

    This is ridiculous.  It is clearly not a Cryptsy problem as Mullick has explained multiple times.  Not only that, but there have been bugs found in the anc code and other exchanges have been having the same problem as cryptsy.  Even users of the qt desktop client are having the same problems!

    The devs need to stop blaming this on cryptsy but instead work to solve the problem.

    Also, if someone could update the community on meeh's progress with myriad AuxPoW it would be great.  As I pointed out before, he was supposed to be working on this for the past month but recently asked in IRC what myriad is.  This is very concerning and a confirmation that we are actually still planning a hardfork would be great.

    Also just a thought but instead of giving deadlines which are hard to meet maybe there could be a weekly or biweekly newsletter in which the devs give updates on their progress.  That's what the storj devs have been doing and it's been working great and no one gets upset about any deadlines.

  • Jungian
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 930
    Merit: 1010


    View Profile
    October 31, 2014, 08:15:41 PM
     #3942
    Quote from: papa_lazzarou on October 31, 2014, 05:15:53 PM
    Quote from: BitcoinSoup on October 30, 2014, 05:23:48 PM

    5) It still is not clear whether the group is a government entity trying to push people toward government created algorithms which have backdoors, like cryptonote, or if it is a private group of profiteers.


    Hi,

    Care to show any proof?

    Thanks

    I'd like to see some too. But I think the we are highly unlikely to see that
    I think Monero (XMR) is very interesting.
    https://moneroeconomy.com/faq/why-monero-matters

  • BitcoinSoup
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 7
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    October 31, 2014, 09:31:13 PM
     #3943
    Quote from: Jungian on October 31, 2014, 08:15:41 PM
    Quote from: papa_lazzarou on October 31, 2014, 05:15:53 PM
    Quote from: BitcoinSoup on October 30, 2014, 05:23:48 PM

    5) It still is not clear whether the group is a government entity trying to push people toward government created algorithms which have backdoors, like cryptonote, or if it is a private group of profiteers.


    Hi,

    Care to show any proof?

    Thanks

    I'd like to see some too. But I think the we are highly unlikely to see that

    There are several very distinct avenues of approach that can be used to classify cn cryptonote as a government project, the product of a collaboration motivated by factors associated with people whose motive is related to law enforcement and/or information gathering.

    A person using the name Jungian should make short work of it, unless the username is an ornament.

    Aside from the blatant psychological clues there are cryptographic questions http://www.cryptobang.com/2014/10/05/what-nsa-created-cryptonote-for/ and other issues that are likely to receive press soon.

    http://www.lolzhumor.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Funny_Pictures_meanwhile-at-the-nsa_6556.jpeg

    https://i.imgur.com/FTBwxxh.jpg

  • niteglider
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 126
    Merit: 100

    Lean into the curves.


    View Profile
    November 02, 2014, 05:13:38 AM
     #3944
    Quote from: BitcoinSoup on October 31, 2014, 09:31:13 PM
    Quote from: Jungian on October 31, 2014, 08:15:41 PM
    Quote from: papa_lazzarou on October 31, 2014, 05:15:53 PM
    Quote from: BitcoinSoup on October 30, 2014, 05:23:48 PM

    5) It still is not clear whether the group is a government entity trying to push people toward government created algorithms which have backdoors, like cryptonote, or if it is a private group of profiteers.


    Hi,

    Care to show any proof?

    Thanks

    I'd like to see some too. But I think the we are highly unlikely to see that

    There are several very distinct avenues of approach that can be used to classify cn cryptonote as a government project, the product of a collaboration motivated by factors associated with people whose motive is related to law enforcement and/or information gathering.

    A person using the name Jungian should make short work of it, unless the username is an ornament.

    Aside from the blatant psychological clues there are cryptographic questions http://www.cryptobang.com/2014/10/05/what-nsa-created-cryptonote-for/ and other issues that are likely to receive press soon.

    weird images



    crickets
    Anoncoin

  • fwiwcoin
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 02, 2014, 09:43:23 PM
    Last edit: November 03, 2014, 01:09:01 AM by fwiwcoin
     #3945
    Quote from: niteglider on November 02, 2014, 05:13:38 AM
    Quote

    weird images



    crickets

    http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2014-04-15-PRETTY_NOSE.jpg


                                                                      ~operation nsa tAkedowN has begun~

  • robinson5
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    November 02, 2014, 10:33:29 PM
    Last edit: November 02, 2014, 10:59:43 PM by robinson5
     #3946
    I really want anc to succeed but I have multiple concerns at this point in time and it would be great if we could get an update from the devs (or anyone else that has any knowledge of what is going on).

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.



    Please don't dismiss this post as a troll.  I'm not a troll but someone who cares about anoncoin.  Anyone who owns anoncoin should realize these three points are really troubling and they should want updates from the devs as well.  What are they doing about the three points above? These things really need to be addressed.  Blindly following the devs and saying "oh they got this" isn't enough.  What are they doing to solve this problem? If anyone knows please reply!


    EDIT: This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

  • thecoinmasterexpert
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 7
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 12:57:58 AM
     #3947
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 02, 2014, 10:33:29 PM
    I really want anc to succeed but I have multiple concerns at this point in time and it would be great if we could get an update from the devs (or anyone else that has any knowledge of what is going on).

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.



    Please don't dismiss this post as a troll.  I'm not a troll but someone who cares about anoncoin.  Anyone who owns anoncoin should realize these three points are really troubling and they should want updates from the devs as well.  What are they doing about the three points above? These things really need to be addressed.  Blindly following the devs and saying "oh they got this" isn't enough.  What are they doing to solve this problem? If anyone knows please reply!


    EDIT: This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

    Trolls like you need to be ignored.
    **added to troll list**


    We should make sure that all of us who are serious about this coin are ignoring the same people so our conversations don't get confused.

    Here is my ignore list. Please synchromize your ignore lists accordingly
    Ignored Users
    meeh
    drAGon925
    BroTroxer
    K1773R
    geekz
    lunokhodk
    no-ice-please
    Skaia
    SmokingSkull
    shtako
    gostrol
    LuigiPabloQuernevacaroli
    klee   
    WDL   
    Gnosis-
    Arlic   
    niteglider   
    n00n
    TheKoziTwo
    A L I E N
    nicksmith   
    captainfuture
    alincoln
    branefreez   
    dewdeded
    Tyke   15
    emunebtk
    Arbitrageur
    Apraksin
    BlurrCrystal

    Kind of weird that this coin has been around a while yet the thread is only four pages long. How can we attract more users?

  • entertheabyss
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 756
    Merit: 508



    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 02:23:07 AM
     #3948
    Quote from: thecoinmasterexpert on November 03, 2014, 12:57:58 AM
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 02, 2014, 10:33:29 PM
    I really want anc to succeed but I have multiple concerns at this point in time and it would be great if we could get an update from the devs (or anyone else that has any knowledge of what is going on).

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.



    Please don't dismiss this post as a troll.  I'm not a troll but someone who cares about anoncoin.  Anyone who owns anoncoin should realize these three points are really troubling and they should want updates from the devs as well.  What are they doing about the three points above? These things really need to be addressed.  Blindly following the devs and saying "oh they got this" isn't enough.  What are they doing to solve this problem? If anyone knows please reply!


    EDIT: This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

    Trolls like you need to be ignored.
    **added to troll list**


    We should make sure that all of us who are serious about this coin are ignoring the same people so our conversations don't get confused.

    Here is my ignore list. Please synchromize your ignore lists accordingly
    Ignored Users
    meeh
    drAGon925
    BroTroxer
    K1773R
    geekz
    lunokhodk
    no-ice-please
    Skaia
    SmokingSkull
    shtako
    gostrol
    LuigiPabloQuernevacaroli
    klee   
    WDL   
    Gnosis-
    Arlic   
    niteglider   
    n00n
    TheKoziTwo
    A L I E N
    nicksmith   
    captainfuture
    alincoln
    branefreez   
    dewdeded
    Tyke   15
    emunebtk
    Arbitrageur
    Apraksin
    BlurrCrystal

    Kind of weird that this coin has been around a while yet the thread is only four pages long. How can we attract more users?

    you forgot to add me... i feel left out Sad
    █████████████████████████████████
    ████████▀▀█▀▀█▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████████
    ████████▄▄█▄▄█▄▄██████████▀██████
    █████░░█░░█░░█░░████████████▀████
    ██▀▀█▀▀█▀▀█▀▀█▀▀██████████████▀██
    ██▄▄█▄▄█▄▄█▄▄█▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄██████████
    ██░░█░░█░░███████████████████████
    ██▀▀█▀▀█▀▀███████████████████████
    ██▄▄█▄▄█▄▄███████████████████████
    ██░░█░░█░░███████████████████████
    ██▀▀█▀▀█▀▀██████████▄▄▄██████████
    ██▄▄█▄▄█▄▄███████████████████████
    ██░░█░░█░░███████████████████████    		██████
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██████
    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
     Crypto Marketing Agency
    By AB de Royse
    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
    ██████
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██████
    		██████
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██████
    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
    WIN $50 FREE RAFFLE
    Community Giveaway
    ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
    ██████
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██
    ██████
    		████████████████████████
    ██    ██████████████████████
    ██████████████████▀▀████
    ██████████████▀▀░░░░████
    ██████████▀▀░░░▄▀░░▐████
    ██████▀▀░░░░▄█▀░░░░█████
    ████▄▄░░░▄██▀░░░░░▐█████
    ████████░█▀░░░░░░░██████
    ████████▌▐░░▄░░░░▐██████
    █████████░▄███▄░░███████
    ████████████████████████
    ████████████████████████
    ████████████████████████

  • An0nj0k3
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 41
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 04:54:17 AM
     #3949
    Quote from: thecoinmasterexpert on November 03, 2014, 12:57:58 AM
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 02, 2014, 10:33:29 PM
    I really want anc to succeed but I have multiple concerns at this point in time and it would be great if we could get an update from the devs (or anyone else that has any knowledge of what is going on).

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.



    Please don't dismiss this post as a troll.  I'm not a troll but someone who cares about anoncoin.  Anyone who owns anoncoin should realize these three points are really troubling and they should want updates from the devs as well.  What are they doing about the three points above? These things really need to be addressed.  Blindly following the devs and saying "oh they got this" isn't enough.  What are they doing to solve this problem? If anyone knows please reply!


    EDIT: This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

    Trolls like you need to be ignored.
    **added to troll list**


    We should make sure that all of us who are serious about this coin are ignoring the same people so our conversations don't get confused.

    Here is my ignore list. Please synchromize your ignore lists accordingly
    Ignored Users
    meeh
    drAGon925
    BroTroxer
    K1773R
    geekz
    lunokhodk
    no-ice-please
    Skaia
    SmokingSkull
    shtako
    gostrol
    LuigiPabloQuernevacaroli
    klee   
    WDL   
    Gnosis-
    Arlic   
    niteglider   
    n00n
    TheKoziTwo
    A L I E N
    nicksmith   
    captainfuture
    alincoln
    branefreez   
    dewdeded
    Tyke   15
    emunebtk
    Arbitrageur
    Apraksin
    BlurrCrystal

    Kind of weird that this coin has been around a while yet the thread is only four pages long. How can we attract more users?

    http://i1120.photobucket.com/albums/l490/T3HNEWBSKI/Not-sure-if-trolling-or-just-stupid.jpg

  • An0nj0k3
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 41
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 05:00:40 AM
     #3950
    Quote from: entertheabyss on November 03, 2014, 02:23:07 AM
    you forgot to add me... i feel left out Sad

    http://www.quickmeme.com/img/2e/2e3870035a13da45a17ee4510a62ef2d541a643c96d20821d0bc9396825b620f.jpg

  • illodin
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 966
    Merit: 1003


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 10:31:59 AM
     #3951
    Quote from: An0nj0k3 on November 03, 2014, 04:54:17 AM

  • sorrros
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 954
    Merit: 104


    ludenaprotocol.io


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 03:36:57 PM
     #3952
    How about some level of moderation for this thread?
    ► LudenaProtocol ◄ ♦️ A Gamified Social Platform for Worldwide Gamers ♦️ ► LudenaProtocol ◄
    ───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●─[   Bounty Detective   ]─●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───
    ▸Website◂ | ▸Twitter◂ | ▸Medium◂ | ▸Telegram◂ | ▸Instagram◂ | ▸Whitepaper◂

  • robinson5
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 05:30:20 PM
     #3953
    Quote from: sorrros on November 03, 2014, 03:36:57 PM
    How about some level of moderation for this thread?

    Are you not concerned about these things?

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.

    4. This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

  • thecoinmasterexpert
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 7
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 06:12:14 PM
     #3954
    Quote from: entertheabyss on November 03, 2014, 02:23:07 AM
    Quote from: thecoinmasterexpert on November 03, 2014, 12:57:58 AM
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 02, 2014, 10:33:29 PM
    I really want anc to succeed but I have multiple concerns at this point in time and it would be great if we could get an update from the devs (or anyone else that has any knowledge of what is going on).

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.



    Please don't dismiss this post as a troll.  I'm not a troll but someone who cares about anoncoin.  Anyone who owns anoncoin should realize these three points are really troubling and they should want updates from the devs as well.  What are they doing about the three points above? These things really need to be addressed.  Blindly following the devs and saying "oh they got this" isn't enough.  What are they doing to solve this problem? If anyone knows please reply!


    EDIT: This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

    Trolls like you need to be ignored.
    **added to troll list**


    We should make sure that all of us who are serious about this coin are ignoring the same people so our conversations don't get confused.

    Here is my ignore list. Please synchromize your ignore lists accordingly
    Ignored Users
    entertheabyss
    meeh
    drAGon925
    BroTroxer
    K1773R
    geekz
    lunokhodk
    no-ice-please
    Skaia
    SmokingSkull
    shtako
    gostrol
    LuigiPabloQuernevacaroli
    klee   
    WDL   
    Gnosis-
    Arlic   
    niteglider   
    n00n
    TheKoziTwo
    A L I E N
    nicksmith   
    captainfuture
    alincoln
    branefreez   
    dewdeded
    Tyke   15
    emunebtk
    Arbitrageur
    Apraksin
    BlurrCrystal

    Kind of weird that this coin has been around a while yet the thread is only four pages long. How can we attract more users?

    you forgot to add me... i feel left out Sad

    ~crickets~

  • dogemoon8888
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 38
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 06:27:08 PM
     #3955
    We have received a request to withdraw 12.89 ANC to the wallet AcB3RT2DPMmDhJJoGKrnZ2P7fiCbB3MbwM

    Please click the link below to confirm the withdrawal:
    https://cex.io/trade/withdraw_confirm?code=caf59ec1a08080b1ad3ece00a43c750a5005c73e5b399c150f7510e47262b768

    ---

    2014-11-02 11:35:08 -12.89 ANC 0.00 WITHDRAW - cabd86dcbe78cce748e053812d005039e3007fb7fab395d8623e72906c7557cf
    can't find the coins~~
    thanks!

    ---

    Your request (45010) has been received and is being reviewed by our support staff.

    To add additional comments, reply to this email.

    ---

    Thank you for your request.

    The ANC wallet has been experiencing some problems, we apologise for any inconvenience caused.

    This ticket will be forwarded to the CEX.IO supervisor for more thorough investigation of your issue.

    Best Regards,
    Daniel
    CEX.IO Support

    ---

    Hey,

    At the moment the ANC system has severe technical diffculties, so we can't check this transaction. Please contact us back after at least one Anoncoin wallet update.

    Best Regards,
    Matthew, CEX.IO support

    ---

    any body can help me,
    thanks all~~~

  • Black Mamba
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 656
    Merit: 500


    Don't Trust Words


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 07:24:29 PM
     #3956
    Wow so much newbie activity over here  Wink

  • robinson5
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 08:08:53 PM
     #3957
    Quote from: Black Mamba on November 03, 2014, 07:24:29 PM
    Wow so much newbie activity over here  Wink

    If you are dismissing my concerns can you please explain why they are not troubling to you?  If you have any information please share it with the community.


    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.

    4. This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537

  • alincoln
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 175
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 08:23:19 PM
     #3958
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 03, 2014, 08:08:53 PM
    Quote from: Black Mamba on November 03, 2014, 07:24:29 PM
    Wow so much newbie activity over here  Wink

    If you are dismissing my concerns can you please explain why they are not troubling to you?  If you have any information please share it with the community.


    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.

    4. This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537


    Doesn't matter if the account is new if the points he raises are valid. These are all perfectly valid concerns IMO.

  • sorrros
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 954
    Merit: 104


    ludenaprotocol.io


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 08:56:17 PM
     #3959
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 03, 2014, 05:30:20 PM
    Quote from: sorrros on November 03, 2014, 03:36:57 PM
    How about some level of moderation for this thread?

    Are you not concerned about these things?

    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.

    4. This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537


    Yes I am as well. I don't see what it has to do with moderation though; the point is not to remove concerns/feedback, just cut the crap! 

    ► LudenaProtocol ◄ ♦️ A Gamified Social Platform for Worldwide Gamers ♦️ ► LudenaProtocol ◄
    ───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●─[   Bounty Detective   ]─●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───●✦●───
    ▸Website◂ | ▸Twitter◂ | ▸Medium◂ | ▸Telegram◂ | ▸Instagram◂ | ▸Whitepaper◂

  • robinson5
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 100


    View Profile
    November 03, 2014, 10:48:01 PM
     #3960
    Quote from: alincoln on November 03, 2014, 08:23:19 PM
    Quote from: robinson5 on November 03, 2014, 08:08:53 PM
    Quote from: Black Mamba on November 03, 2014, 07:24:29 PM
    Wow so much newbie activity over here  Wink

    If you are dismissing my concerns can you please explain why they are not troubling to you?  If you have any information please share it with the community.


    1. K1773R is still blaming the transaction problem on cryptsy.  There have been bugs found in the anoncoin code and cryptsy is compiling from source.  Other exchanges and even desktop qt clients are having the same problem as cryptsy.  So this can't be a cryptsy problem.  I would really like if the devs would work on this problem seeing as a cryptocurrency with transaction problems is obviously really bad.  What are the devs doing to fix this? We need anoncoin back on exchanges asap.

    2. Meeh has been working on myriad auxPoW for the past month but recently asked what myriad auxPoW is.  Since he can't develop something he doesn't know about what has he been doing? An update on the supposed "imminent" hardfork would be great.  The sooner this hardfork happens the sooner anoncoin can fix the difficulty issue.

    3. Anoncoin code is still based on bitcoin 0.8.6 which is almost a year old at this point.  Why hasn't the anoncoin code been updated? Bitcoin is currently on 0.9.3 and there have 4 updates in between 0.8.6 and 0.9.3.  Why has anoncoin missed all 4 updates?  Gnosis recently posted that meeh was working on updating the code to 0.9.3 but that concerns me because meeh was also supposed to be working on myriad auxPoW but seems to not be doing too well with that either.

    4. This conversation with ian miers of zerocash is also troubling.  He doesn't seem to think our RSA UFO's are strong enough.  https://twitter.com/secparam/status/449576116161089537


    Doesn't matter if the account is new if the points he raises are valid. These are all perfectly valid concerns IMO.

    Thank you alincoln! Hopefully the devs will get back to us soon and answer some of these questions
    Pages: « 1 ... 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 [198] 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 ... 264 »
      Print  
Page 197
Viewing Page: 198

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com