BABB SCAM BANKI created articles and published in my blog/forum, now they don't like my audience. I only have 140 followers on Steemet... 40 on Medium
This is a unique and readable article.
I have a reason:
no outreach/no value/not much original/wrong info
But they took all the "water". Unreadable articles with bots.
https://steemit.com/crypto/@happyweblancer/babb-bank-v-smartfoneThe author has 1000 subscribers, but not original articles and 2 stakes!
This is not entirely the original introductory speech, which is used in most articles.
No restrictions in the rules was not, I would not write about them. I wrote about the project after reviewing all the rules. It's just a Scam. I advise investors to run away from these scams.
BABB is not scam for now. But Amazix management is not good. My audience more 600 hunters per day. But my content was not accepted because it's "copy/paste".
[b]Rules:[/b]
1. The blog/forum must be focused on a relevant topic (at the sole discretion of AmaZix/BABB)
2. Blog posts must have at least 250 words and forum posts must have at least 100 words.
3. Blogs/forums/videos in languages other than English may also be accepted (at the sole discretion of AmaZix/BABB). Please contact me first to check.
4. Videos have to be meaningful and related to BABB: the Token Sale, aspects of the Whitepaper, e-sports, related technology, etc.
5. Videos/articles with fake views will be disqualified
6. Only [b]original content[/b] will be accepted
7. Spamming/posting in wrong subforums will not be tolerated. Posts deleted or closed by the forums administration will not count.
As you can see in rules no information about copy/paste. Original content and copy/paste these are different things. My content is original, but made with copy/paste. (You can find me in content spreadsheet). The audience of my site is more useful than most blogs here. However, as I was answered in the chat - the audience is not important, the content should be completely unique. Therefore, I see no reason to deny you.
But
all this is not important. Suppose I agree with a blurry definition of the
original content and the fact that
I have 0 stacks. After two questions in telegram and trying to change the solution,
I was banned without warning. I also found many similar cases with other hunters with this management team. I think this is not professional for a team that calls itself professionals. A professional team should ban users only in rare cases.
