As a investor, fear, uncertainty and doubt is exactly what I feel about Credits. Given the high targets of the projects, I had high expectation about the code review. I didnt expected comments like these:
"Ok guys, Im done for now, I really loved that the guys from Credits gave me the client early, and I really wanted to like the code more, but its still basic and unfortunately
junior code. They did improve from last time, but its still so far away from being something real, we arent at PoC level yet, we cant be talking about beta already.
Conclusion: They did update MD5 to Blake, but the rest is unfortunately still no where near the level it needs to be able to compete in this field or against the caliber of developers out there. Credits team, lets talk, I want to help"
So I did not got what you mean by "twisted the truth". What is the true? Did they prove what they claim?
Iam in for the product, not for the marketing....hope we have better reviews on the short term. Thank you for your wellcome!
Hi all, this is my first message here.
At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis:
https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here?
I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything...
Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-)
If you read through it carefully he is quite positive in many of his comments. His main criticism is he doesn't have full visibility which he wants. Its not the complete code so he can't see the though put of the 400k tps he wants to see but and no one said it was the fuil code yet. For context look at the guys other reviews, even big respected projects he's pretty negative on. I think he is sincere reviewer of what he can see at this early stage but its others suggesting the review is only bad who are twisting the truth. Like you newbie fudder. lol
This review is not a comment on the overall project, scope, or success thereofSo far, Im not seeing anything new from the Credits team, but they are using a bunch of cool technologies, this is less a ground up build and more a Frankenstein approach (I like a good Frankenstein approach though), lets continue"Unfortunately, we cant interrogate the Node, and we cant send transactions, so nothing we can continue there unfortunately, so we cant confirm their TPS claims just yet.
