I am a fan of simplicity so I am already quite happy with the current looks although a nice red bottle cap on the overview button would seem like a nice finishing touch.

I have another question though: are there any plans to update the 'autosave'-function with a programmable return address like HBN has as of lately? Cause it really works great!

Here are my connections:

"addr" : "62.210.122.161:7685",

"addr" : "107.170.113.225:7685",

"addr" : "78.46.40.180:7685",

"addr" : "176.37.67.61:7685",

"addr" : "128.199.135.188:7685",

"addr" : "63.231.13.66:7685",

"addr" : "218.240.43.165:7685",

Yes I do plan to add some of the updates from HBN to CAPs. What you have mentioned plus the auto combining.

Was waiting until we got some of the new icons ready. Looks like we are making progress.

No its not you, it was just a mock up, the CAP part also is not the same size so that needs resizing and it all needs re-centering. I'm not sure if we want to use it for anything just yet so I'll leave it there for now. I can send someone the inkscape file if anyone wants to have a play. Personally, I also think it could do with something extra as its seems a little bland at the moment but thats only if we end up using it for anything anyway.

Would it be possible to code in customizable skins? Something like Hyp's wallet skin selector? That way we could potentially get some new visual styles working in the wallet

Wel it's just an idea for now, depends if anyone else in the community would like to see this as well. If so after we get the icons looking good for the wallet, we could throw some images around on what another look for the wallet could be. These are big "ifs" though. I'm sure there are other suggestions people might like to see in the next update as well.


A good mix of both is always nice , but if we have to choose functionality should probably take precedence.

Touché!

Now I come to think of it, I have another:

You mentioned before something to favor large stakeholders, top 20 I believe. To allow them higher split/combine levels. To make it easier for them just to stake away without the need for manual recombining all the time. Something quite valuable if you have a lot of coins that you don't want to see splitting until you end up having many thousands of small separate blocks.


So this would be my idea:

Defining a large stakeholder as any single address which holds >1% of the money supply. By this time it means just about the top 20 but because its related to the money supply, it will grow along as we develop.
Premium: I would suggest a Splitting/Recombining privilege that enables the large stake holders to limit their amount of blocks to an estimate of 500, corresponding with a Splitting/Recombining level of 0,2% of their wallet size.

Example:
Lets say you own 100Kcap on a single address and the money supply is 7000Kcap. In a case like that you would qualify for being a large stake holder (100/7000 = 1,43%).
Now, for being a large stake holder, your split/combine level shifts from a max of 20 to 0,2% of 100K which is 200. A pretty nice advantage I would say! Never more than 500 blocks and less need for manual recombining, serving the consensus function of POS as well.


I am really curious as to what everyone thinks of something like this.

Hmm, no I´m staking ,Not understand, what´s the advantage to get the block with the 7th Million Coin?

With going fast into the top30 balances with my little wallet (CAP very cheap at 3000sat right now, lot´s of potential imaho ) how should i split my blocks for best staking performance?