I think they could try but I think it would be an attempt that would fail because you see of all the BTC out there roughly two thirds of is held and never been sold. They could only accumulate the other one third and that is if they bought every single bitcoin! I think it is far fetched but a fun theory to discuss still.

You're missing the incentive.  Governments have no decent incentive to attempt to "destroy" a cryptocurrency.
The only incentive which a government possibly could have to try and "destroy" a cryptocurrency would be to prevent its use on darknet markets, but a decrease in price would not prevent this use much at all, so they certainly would not do this.
That hypothesis is irrelevant, but if they wanted to attempt an actual attack (like a 51% attack for example), it would be extremely costly and time-consuming for something so trivial.  That's the purpose of the PoW system - to make it economically unfeasible for any single entity to attack the network.

Well op I agree with you. PoW system do prevents such events to happen. And even staying for months here in the forum you have enlightened me.
But what's bothering me was the big manipulation that just happened recently. Even though I have read about systems protecting Bitcoin it is still confusing. Leaving questions about what just happened. But grateful that I have strong hands.

They won't reach that point since Bitcoin community members have considerably enough consciousness and while bitcoin is getting more popularity and support from people , governments can just stay far and look to this high powerful currency getting stronger and stronger . I think Bitcoin is so strong to be destroyed by governors

Governments do have incentive though. If Bitcoin became the currency of the future, governments would no longer have control over money like they always have. Cryptocurrencies are threatening governments power.

It really depends. Some governments do not want multiple currencies that compete with the currency it controls. It threatens the governments financial control. On the other hand, some countries could care less, especially the ones that are not tecnologically advanced.

It all depends on the kind of community bitcoin has. Bitcoin has reached $10.000 and is hitting headlines on all finance media. It's not just YouTubers that talk about bitcoin, or specialized news sites like Coindesk or Cointelegraph, we have CNBC, we have Forbes, we have Financial Times, etc. This causes FOMO (fear of missing out), and a lot of shaky hands will now get into bitcoin. If the majority of the bitcoin community is build with panic buyers, then of course we can see panic sells. I love adoption, and I'm glad people are getting into bitcoin, but I hope they understand what bitcoin is. Otherwise what you said could be true, and it doesn't need to be governments doing it. Anyone who is rich, can try to influence the market and cause panic sells.

Of course that if our community is strong, and well informed, then that cannot happen. They buy and we appreciate, they sell and we just keep holding and don't really care, because we know the potencial of bitcoin, and we still want to use it.

That was the case with the Venezuelan government when they decided to crack down on those that were mining bitcoins in the country,  even with all their efforts,  people are still mining bitcoins, nothing can really bring down completely even in the case where they ban it and the value plummets,  it sure to rise up again.

Banning a currency and manipulating its price are two very different things. It is nearly impossible to successfully ban something that by nature is decentralized. But if they tried to actually destroy the currency then that is possible but like I said earlier, very very unlikely.

I only started this topic to see what others thought of this idea.

Really? Do you have an examples? I mean yes there have been some bumps along the road caused by governments (Such as China) but I haven't seen any governments set on destroying bitcoin. They simply disapprove.