snip
[/quote]

Just build new rig for XDB dude ! I also still support wildkeccak because my gtx 750 ti can do 750 kh only with 25 watt power.
[/quote]
With what $ I have my 750ti rig too. That's why I want wildkeccak. [2017-12-10 21:01:59] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 971.30 kH/s
Read back.. I changed my mind.
GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 920.15 kH/s
GPU #1: 1346 MHz 37.89 kH/W 24W 49C FAN 56%

[/quote]

yeah, wildkeccak algo has one of the best indicators of gpu temp and different cards do not have too much of a difference in hashrate.
[/quote]
Yes running at 40% tdp too.
Other cards suck at this algo.
wildkeccak ALGO at stock core and mem and lowest power setting for highest efficiency
[2017-12-04 21:49:19] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti, 1496.31 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:31] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 970, 1479.46 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:34] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 970, 1479.51 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:35] accepted: 10618/10767 (diff 1.809), 7881.14 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-04 21:49:35] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti, 1578.60 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:41] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1070, 1842.32 kH/s

With what $ I have my 750ti rig too. That's why I want wildkeccak. [2017-12-10 21:01:59] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 971.30 kH/s
Read back.. I changed my mind.
GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 920.15 kH/s
GPU #1: 1346 MHz 37.89 kH/W 24W 49C FAN 56%

[/quote]

yeah, wildkeccak algo has one of the best indicators of gpu temp and different cards do not have too much of a difference in hashrate.
[/quote]
Yes running at 40% tdp too.
Other cards suck at this algo.
wildkeccak ALGO at stock core and mem and lowest power setting for highest efficiency
[2017-12-04 21:49:19] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti, 1496.31 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:31] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 970, 1479.46 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:34] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 970, 1479.51 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:35] accepted: 10618/10767 (diff 1.809), 7881.14 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-04 21:49:35] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti, 1578.60 kH/s
[2017-12-04 21:49:41] GPU #0: EVGA GTX 1070, 1842.32 kH/s
[/quote]

what miner Software ？
[/quote]
ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda7.5.

Your welcome and there is ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda8.0 and  ccminer-x64-2.2.3

stock core and mem and 381.65 driver
ccminer -q -a wildkeccak -o stratum+tcp://bbr.miningclub.info:7777 -u 1CvHnt7dT94EsV5u9cESUEFDKcSDRsSJw294XjEnV3taAi4vkzukn7sNBu1jG6k5kF27odtRW4LvZ6K 3HKzMntM24Ayq78P -p x -k http://bbr.miningclub.info/scratchpad.bin -l 60x256

Dev,

Below are the question I would like to confirm and decide if it's fair to be here and support this coin.

1) As this is new coin as it has new ticker will this start afresh or just a hard fork with only option to mine from last block of boolberry.

2) You say you have worked 7 months and overhauled the complete structure. will it give benefit to new members on new cryptonight algo apart from what boolberry used to provide.

ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda7.5.exe -a wildkeccak  -t 2 -l 60x512  on 2 cards  -t 6 on 6 cards.  Sorry I have to post the OC not the true clocks... 1345 core of course but up to +700 mem if it doesn't crash if so +600 is better.

EDIT: 1,650mhz on memory.

Guesstimation.. What?...

[2017-12-15 06:24:42] GPU #2: 1345 MHz 32.19 kH/W 22W 46C FAN 45%
[2017-12-15 06:24:42] accepted: 2940/2946 (diff 4.806), 4436.20 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:42] accepted: 2941/2947 (diff 1.462), 4436.15 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:45] accepted: 2942/2948 (diff 1.193), 4436.11 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:45] accepted: 2943/2949 (diff 1.580), 4436.23 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:47] accepted: 2944/2950 (diff 2.404), 4436.29 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:48] accepted: 2945/2951 (diff 1.297), 4436.30 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:48] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 721.36 kH/s
[2017-12-15 06:24:48] accepted: 2946/2952 (diff 1.964), 4436.33 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:48] accepted: 2947/2953 (diff 1.442), 4436.46 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:50] accepted: 2948/2954 (diff 6.550), 4436.48 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:50] accepted: 2949/2955 (diff 4.103), 4436.49 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:51] accepted: 2950/2956 (diff 1.261), 4436.43 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:52] accepted: 2951/2957 (diff 6.899), 4436.11 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:53] accepted: 2952/2958 (diff 1.380), 4436.12 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:55] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 712.75 kH/s
[2017-12-15 06:24:55] accepted: 2953/2959 (diff 11.952), 4436.02 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:24:55] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 925.69 kH/s
[2017-12-15 06:26:18] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 750 Ti, 932.59 kH/s
[2017-12-15 06:26:41] accepted: 3040/3046 (diff 3.064), 4422.22 kH/s yes!
[2017-12-15 06:26:43] GPU #4: 1337 MHz 36.26 kH/W 25W 45C FAN 44%

What is the total supply of Doubloon? Thanks.

While I appreciate all your feedback, my point is that we haven't even begun Itsuku public testing and you're asking us not to use it.. It doesn't really make a lot of sense given all the work we've put into it. Try the algorithm and see what your hashrate is before passing judgement on it. Technology will always move forward, the solution is to adapt to it. We want as many different cards testing the algo so we can compile all the results. That said, this project will go in a different direction than BBR once the network is online so you'll always have the option of mining WK.