I am not selfish here. I didn't even invest. But it´s a high level of risk which leads to potential high level of return. Just think about the NXT donation/ ICO. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.

  did you even read the first page?

I just think everyone is responsible for his own loss/gain. Everyone who invested should be able to accept a total loss of funds, like in possibly nearly 90% of the icos. There is never a guarantee in crypto.

Hi,

At the begining, in december, I wanted to invest. But I saw to much similar project : stone, manta, azulik, constellation, wisp, page... So I decided to not invest without code. Every body and mostly newbies forget that raiblock (nano) had publied their code. (if I remember correctly and if I'm wrong, correct me please)

I tried to check whois of mantacurrency.org and stonecurrency.org, there is no infos, just google anonymous subscription.....

I think they will not publy codes, so why we don't launch this project (raiblock + anonymous function) together? I strongly believe in this concept.

First of , I will open a thread, we will not ask donation, we have to talk around us to find devs, and start an exchange about the feasibility.

When we will know how to do that, we will able to determine how many dev we have to hire and how much we will pay them. In that way, We will be able to define a roadmap.

Look at this project, he rised more than 500k, it's too much. How many dev could we hire with this money?

And a dev team is more effective than one guy...

PM me, I think , we have time to set up our project before them.

what do you think about this approach?

Thx

As many people have pointed, I'm just a crypto enthusiast web designer looking to help different DAG projects. Don't know if this is a scam yet, but hope to see some code on GitHub soon.

Can you please update your web page to clearly show that this is you own contribution and nothing to do with Felixando. Otherwise we get all these scam claims because it is similar to other pages you have created.

Felixando,

So that we can avoid some of the issues Nano has ran into I would like to suggest that a wallet be created for regular peer to peer users and a "exchange wallet" be created that creates a horizontal implementation of wallet addresses that are off the node and only send the raw blocks to node that are signed, so that we have no issues of orphaned blocks being resent (ie double tx node issues). Let's learn from raiblocks mess ups and build on that so ours does not suffer from the same pitfalls. If you would like me to go more in depth I will. Thanks!

There is nothing wrong with the RaiBlocks network protocol. Bitgrail exchange got exploited because of poor coding.

my two cents , i am a man of few words:

1) felixando would exit scam already if that was his plan 
2) obviously software project timelines get extended and it comes with no surprise 
3) we took a super huge risk investing and that's the only way you get into the project at a valuation of $2M. If/when technology gets delivered the project's minimum market cap would be $100M considering similar projects and current market state and that's 50X. If you are not willing to have your investment scammed or totally **annihilated** to ZERO then you wait and buy at an exchange at a much higher price. 

these things are very obvious and self-explanatory. 

Thanks for the feedback. I've gone ahead and made the appropriate updates.