What is your telegram nickname?

Wait for updates please, I ll answer all your questions. Be patient please

Dear forum members be polite please.
Our team shocked of the wave of messages with threats, negative and insults in pm. For example Sairam (our team lead developer with team from 12 developers).

Please stop it.

What a load of garbage. This is not S2X/NYA, this isn't even remotely related to S2X - for fucks sake, you have 4MB BLOCKS.

How desperate do scammers have to be to rip off the name of an anticipated fork just to launch their shitcoin?

hey there,
listing your shit on Yoshit exchange is an enough proof for me that your coin is a scam.
even your lead developer admit that he has NO clue with your project.
try again.

I fully agree with you!

Kindly share this so we can save new greedy investors from losing more money.

1. The team listed on the website http://b2x-segwit.io/ is entirely fake, they have no clue about the project. Apparently they were paid so that their faces could be used on the website, by some Russian group. I can share proof of this if needed.

2. Users asking legitimate questions about the project on the Telegram group were instantly banned, and no answers provided.

3. No details available about the exact PreMine and how much of it goes to the team.

4. No code available for review.

Even with all these signs, new noob investors are blindly investing in exchanges like YoBit, out of pure greed and with no clue that they are investing in futures and not an actual coin.

If you find more loopholes about this B2X do share them here and spread the word! Scam forks like these affect our entire crypto community.

I see many things unclear about this "hard fork".

1) First of all, they use a completely different hash. This means they can't count on the current btc/bch miners to switch mining this coin. Sha256 asics can't mine X11.
2) Then, "reply protection". Due to 1), a transaction on one chain _cannot_ be duplicated on the second chain, for the hashing algo being different. What's this "reply protection" for then?
3) block size 4MB, block generation time 2.5 min, complexity adjustement every generated block: these have noting in common with the "old" segwit2x proposal. These are not simple adjustments, but radical changes.
4) developement process unclear: where are the papers talking about the changes, where they were discussed, where are the developer's public mailing lists and the source code git repositories for public review?

So, it is clear this is not a "hard fork", but a brand new altcoin, not community-driven. Nothing bad so far, except the name "segwit2x".
Sorry but the suspect this name was chosen for gaining popularity (or other purposes) is heavy.

I wonder what this coin has actually to do with segwit2x futures: these futures were issued on a proposed btc hard fork, now they seem to be "redirected" to another altcoin which has in common with the failed HF only...the name.

be polite please and wait for comments of this situation

thank you for your support,  we will post all the information asap