Yes, however, the rejected shares shouldn't matter that much, as "Bob" still had a consistently higher accepted hashrate, yet was making less.

My payout tonight was very very close to 0.01 BTC per MH/s, which puts me in line with "bob"

I've also been around a while, and I'm on the main server, not one of the newer "beta" ones

I think the best explanation is the one already proposed - the smaller servers can more effectively "coin hop" for increased profitability while the older "main" server can pretty much only do LTC, DOGE, and a few others

Of course, others will say that H2O starts siphoning payout for himself after you've been around a while :-P

In order to test the server theory, you should switch all miners to a different address for a day (on same server), then add up the total made in 24 hrs (exchanged + unexchanged + immature) and compare it to what another person (who has been on the server for a while) with a very similar hashrate rejects made during that same 24 hr period (remember to check the difference in the unexchanged balance as well as the payout)

As long as there's no "leeching" going on, the payouts should be identical...

Now take your miners and point them at one of the beta servers for 24 hours and again record what you made... compare this to the payout of the equal hashpower address and see if they still match.

Yeah he is the second guy.

I'm getting around 5-7% rejects or so on the main server - what are you getting?

My rejects are high than others probably because it goes Rig --> switch --> EOP --> switch --> modem, which unfortunately adds a bit of latency

As for the lower reported hash rate, how do your Worker Units compare to your reported hashrate?

My Accepted + Rejected is within 2% of what is should be, so unfortunately I can't help you much there.

You could always create another address and point your rig(s) to that instead and see what happens.

Is it just me or would a scrypt asic not look like this at all?  It would either be a big, big die with lots of expensive as hell eDRAM and a memory controller, or go external and put some expensive GDDR5 chips on the PCB. Basically, it would wind up looking like a GPU, no. So... this is bullshit?

This is my numbers that I posted earlier:
572 shares - 152 Reject - 5.33 MH/s.

I have 2 7970's, 2 r9 280x's, and 6 7950's.

The 7950's are getting 600 Kh/s each (different rigs, different numbers)
the 7970's and 280x's are all getting 730 kh/s each.

So all my hashing power together gets me 6,520 Kh/s. Yet on middlecoin I keep going between 4.0-6.5 Mh/s. Usually I'm around 6.3-6.5. But for the last 4 days, I keep losing hashrate and getting more rejects.

I must have missed that - my bad. So the 2nd guy is running ~150 - 160MH/s. 2 MH/s per server given 80 servers - that's far more sane.

Leave them running more than a day, try a week at least. Good plan though, Can you throw some rigs onto the beta servers? I don't really have identical rigs that I can switch around, there are always differences.

Very close is easy, I'm just still setting up the majority of them. Very close should work for comparison testing.

Granted. I usually see a difference of around 1 to 5 % between otherwise identical rigs. I try to take the differences into account when comparison testing so the results make sense.