You are wrong! Hacker is hacker. When there was no laws and unnecesary prejudice against people who understand computers and hack into computer networks, all hackers were called hackers. Crackers are neologism artifically created to distant from people who hack websites, write malware and other stuff. This is wrong. I have seen on numerous ocassions how so called "white hat" hackers from well known security companies get boored and deface websites just for fun.
You expressed your disagreement with the original meaning of the work "hacker", however I missed the part where you actually explained why you do. Some hackers (In the original meaning) break into computer systems as well, both my first message in the thread and the articles I pointed to acknowledge this fact, It's not clear to me if you interpret this as a confirmation than "to hack" means to break into computer systems; that would be a
non sequitur.
Basically in my opinion it is not evil to deface some website, take down some small part of network or write new piece of worm as long as the CRT monitor of the victim does not explode and blast shrapnel in face.
I agree but this is unrelated to the issue and likely to invite flames as the following one.
So you are fine with burning down a mom and pop store as long as you don't kill them in the process? :rolleyes Ah, naivete.
I'm fine with site defacing because it's a resounding way to expose a hole and force a fix, it can prevent a harmful attack. Of course, I would prefer a bug report but some sysadmins/webmasters will ignore them.
nhodges is totally missing the point with his message in mi opinion.