It's up to 5 ETH because of the additional 7500 CMT which is almost the value of 2 ETH.


I myself have been confirmed after 11 days. There's maybe some issue with your registration. Have you received an email that you're declined? If not, check the website to confirm if you're decline or not. You could do a follow up on their telegram channel. PM one of the admins to check the status of your application. Usually it really takes longer for no reason. One thing's for sure, there are hundred thousand people who sent their KYC application. Imagine how the work being done behind on a relatively smaller time.

For all the results, the level of the HIpe in this project goes over + the low drop on the input to the ico will add to the received tokens of value.

In addition, there are already 4.0 Blockchain and everyone wants to ride on the wave of the HYIP and collect as much money as possible in exchange for their tokens! ArcBlock has a thoughtful and universal protocol, it remains to be expected when it will be fully implemented!

I agree it doesnt mean the project will succeed but it is for sure one of the indicators to focus on. There are a lot of project starting on blockchain and its certainly hard to attract attention. ICO success is one of the ways which you can orientate with about the projects future.

Arcblock is a growing ecosystem of its own, not just sofware platform built by one of the organizations that are centered. This platform was also driven by the economics of the token and will continue to evolve by itself.

Join us  ! Great project! Making the blockchain free use is key to widespread adoption. Free Platform enhance the capacities of developers and companies to create valuable new services that they can monetize, not users pay for the use of the blockchain network.

There's a lot of red flags with this ICO when I looked into it.

It hasen't got a base, no code to prove they've actually started, excuses was they're doing it in a closed source project developement style where as almost all ICOs are open source and free for people to view the code and contribute help out. I don't see a reason why they wouldn't make their project development open source. A reason like people stealing the code isn't a good excuse either because if you believe in your project to be successful then you have nothing to worry about.

Founder/CEO has a past as an entrepreneur with 4 businesses in the past, 2 of which was sold and one of them didn't go well according to what the CEO said. This could imply that this ICO is just a money grab and they might not deliver or produce the project poorly.

ALL the media mentions on their website when ArcBlock listed them wasen't true at all, CEO/Founder of ArcBlock even verifyed this during their AMA with Ian, saying that they did talk with the interviewers and that they haven't posted the articles about ArcBlock yet. The CEO said if he could do their marketing differently he wouldn’t of put those Media claimed coverage on their website before it was published, in short there was no article of them being mentioned.

Parnterships with IBM isn't what it seem like it seems to be, ArcBlock sighned up with a programm with cloud IBM which he said it himself that “anyone” could join and this makes them a partner. So it wasn’t a partnership you see with Stellar and IBM. I'm pretty sure IBM doesn't even know that ArcBlock is using their name and Logo on their website for that matter.

They only listed 4 people on their team with an excuse of not wanting to disrupt anyone on the team by putting them up on the website and only wanted to list the key members. This is a very weak excuse and why would it distrube the development team members if you listed them on the website? All ICO project did this, implies they're trying to hide something.

In conclusion ArcBlock CEO/Founder doesn't seem to have much transparency with us the communiity, unless what they claim is actually true and they aren't trying to obscure or hide anything. This makes ArcBlock ICO with a $45,000,000 starting marketcap a risky one to take as its a pretty large one at that and even further more risker as a long term hold.

I'm hesitant as to invest into this ICO. To sum this up the CEO/Founder might just be using this ICO as a cash grab, media mentions are none existant at the time it was listed on ArcBlock's website. Can't evaluate if ArcBlock can claim what they promise due to no listings of their whole team, if there is anymore than 4 people. Partnerships seems exagerated.

This is FUD because it is fear, uncertainty and doubt, which is what I felt when I looked into it and the responses I gathered on their reddit and AMA youtube video. I'm only trying to be honest here. Though I'm not saying this ICO won't make you money if you invest into it. Would like some thoughts on this.

i think that after entering the exchange, I will consider buying coins in the long run!

The ArcBlock platform allows developers to avoid the trivial details of the underlying block chain protocol and focus on the application itself. From this point of view, ArckBlock is very similar to what the NetEase did in that year. So the Ding Lei platform Arcblock, can be said unforeseen, but also reasonable.