Maybe because this is the third time someone highlight this point and they already replied to this question.
You don't need to spam the topic knowing that you accuse them to be a scam because they deleted your question, which is the same as the one on the top of this page that no one can miss and also on the previous page.
It's not because you aren't happy with their reply that it's a scam ... I'm pretty happy with their reply which for me means expected end of donation the 16th, as they will get tons of donation (and hit their target) the day the whitepaper and the code are released meaning they are confident with their work.
Really i would prefer someone to challenge them technically speaking, it's public they show it, is it feasible ? i have no idea, i'm not computer science guy, but this is the first time i see something like that so i'm curious, and as far as i understand it's a very strong approach.
In the end stop the FUD and if you think it's not legit explain exactly why it can't be done as they said. I like the project it looks legit but of course i can't be 100% sure however it's fine for me they clean up the FUD as long as someone before you raised the same question.
Your naive, very naive.
There is ZERO proof, and when they actually release their white paper, donations ends.
It's too much of a coincidence, I mean what it really does say about the people who invest into the project at this stage, is that they are stupid.
You just seem like a paid chill, or an alt.
If you invest at this point with zero proof at all, you are stupid.
