It is really more anonymous than the other mixer which uses a common way of mixing coins? LoyceV made a list of all BTC-Addresses with a balance and he filtered the list by the specific sizes of chipmixer chips (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and so on). Isn't that another piece of the puzzle to deanonymize someone?

ChipMixer allowes certain amount to be mixed like said above; 1,2,4,8.... mBTC which allows you to filter the probable ChipMixer users by getting all the addresses containing the same amount of input.

Visit- https://chipmixer.com/faq, I guess this will help you understanding how ChipMixer works.

Use TOR browser and onion address- http://chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion/
That's enough for being secured from tracking data by the website which is unlikely though.

Sending 0.006 BTC, you will receive two chips: 1 x 0.002 BTC and 1 x 0.004 BTC (there is no 0.006 BTC chip). If you send an extra 0.002 BTC, you can get another chip of 0.002 BTC and merge the three of them for a single one of 0.008 BTC.

Just discover this mixer Go-Overt after the lunch a signature campaign : Go-Overt - Bitcoin Mixer 2.0 Signature Campaign
⭐Name:Go-Overt
🔹Clearnet link: https://www.go-overt.com/
🔹Tor link: https://overtsgjd4xmgu25uegho7p3ez47solhiri5xpylcgm2tlofbafrzwid.onion/
🔹Bitcointalk thread link: Here
🔹Fees: 4.9% + 0.0007 BTC
🔹Minimum amount: 0.005

What kind of updates you are looking for? If you noticed any info to be added or removed, easy to ask op to do so. OP was recently updated last month .

I just used sbqaxe6dwiydetyr.onion for the first time
after my deposit got confirmed i tried to send a payment, but every time when i try to do it i get a blank page.
on the network requests i see it returns status code 500.
I left their support a message, but did anyone encounter this issue?
Is there a TOR configuration i can use to fix this issue?

The main thread is misleading
the title is list of tumblers
some of the websites it says scam and some doesn't, this one it didn't say :-(
so i trusted it.
so where can i find the list of the reliable ones?

Sorry for delay. No, I was just thinking if there has been any new "players" in town worth looking for. Nothing special. The list is OK for info.

It's good to mix the mixers sometimes that's why.



If we need to wait "a long time" before using a mixer, before its reputation is done, then not any mixer could sustain and couldn't progress anyway. All mixers start with zero reputation, including Chipmixer. The service started from scratch.

It's just some are smarter than others when marketing their site (and advertising on bitcointalk is not necessary the 1st place to market a service)
This is also why a lot close their service: low traffic, low activity, so low revenue and then decide to scam (not all do that by the way)


More Bitcoin mixers we have, better it is for everybody, for Bitcoin and some niches too. All desnerve a chance to prove that they can be reliable.

MyCryptoMixer.com has an active scam accusation, I guess at least remove the site on the list temporarily until resolve or completely move to scam mixer list.

@bL4nkcode

Thxs.
I will remove it (and re-add it if it's resolved) but I believe they have a technical difficulty. From what I saw this afternoon it has to do with their server. If it's not resolved then the website will go offline next week.



Considering the effort/resources that have been spent to promote their service I find it weird to disappear after a few months of operating.

@darktor

There are already 2 topic/post with such a list, I don't think there is a need for a third, nor to make another one in every forum section