Of course it does. The majority of power that a government possesses comes from their ability to endlessly print money out of thin air. Obviously BTC and other Cryptos compete with this and therefore you can expect heavy resistance.

Yes, and a massive threat. Cause it's not only bitcoin which threatens them, its the idea that currency doesn't have to be centralized and that with the right code, approach, community, and dev team a decentralized coin can not only work but it can thrive and be accepted by people.

If you were to tell people this was going to happen 25 years ago, they would have LAUGHED at you and called the money monopoly money. So this idea alongside bitcoin the banks are going to have to change their ways (IF BITCOIN GOES MAINSTREAM) which is something that no bank wants to do, as they'd rather justmake massive amounts of money and not be subject to change at all.

Of course it is a threat to banks that's why they are thinking of ways to make people think that investing in bitcoin is bad idea and their money will be worthless in the future. As you can observed, most of those people who appeared in news are those bankers who will say their opinion about cryptocurrencies and it would definitely be a negative opinion to convince others to continue to trust them and not pull out the funds of those who are already diversifying their investments. Since banks are big source of tax as well then they have a power to influence the decision of government and then make up some stories so that government would ban cryptos because they are afraid of it.

I dont think banks will disppear but I am sure they will change by times and demands the  way they operate and modernize them.

Such conflicts must be faced. For example, in China, Bitcoin has seriously affected the country's financial order and has made it difficult to trace the difficulty of regulation of banks and some payment activities. Therefore, China completely forbids the transaction of bitcoin in its own country and the prohibition of bit Currency and legal currency their own currency exchange

Bitcoin does not need middleman or 'banks' in having their transactions. This is the reason why bitcoin impose a big threat to governments specifically the banks. If all people turn out to be using bitcoin, then it will be a disaster for them, they will be useless if this event will happen. But of course, not all the people can afford or has the ability to join because of personal excuses so that banks are still in function. Its just the function of banks will be lesser than what they are in the past.

not so far and probably not for a while either.

so far existence of bitcoin meant more money for banks! their revenue has actually increased thanks to bitcoin and the traders. the money they are earning from fees that they take from bitcoiners who are going in and out of bitcoin has been great for them.

and bitcoin doesn't have to be the end of banks like digital photography was to Kodak. banks are just services which are being offered for money. and bitcoin being money can need many of those services such as a bank account which pays you interest, loans, some services that credit cards offer like the credit you get and then pay it later.

No matter what type of transfer people prefer, it's not that hard to add cryptocurrencies. Perhaps the trend is that banks should support Bitcoin growth. After all, cryptocurrencies have proven to be a cost-effective method of transfer or remittance.

Bitcoin is still a threat to the banks getting their profits in former volumes, as people leave banking services and turn to crypto currency, which gives a big profit, payments are always available, are relatively anonymous and are conducted without the participation of third parties, that is, the same banks.
However, in my opinion, the crypto currency is not a threat to the existence of the banks themselves. The state will always need banks, it is a financial instrument of the state and it is unlikely to disappear in the foreseeable future. If the crypto currency will threaten the existence of banks, then the states will rather prefer to limit the currency than go to liquidate the banks.

Of course I think Bitcoin is a threat to banks and that is one of the reasons why the government have not regulated these digital coins too. But I also doubt banks would disappear just because people will be drawing their attention more to these digital coins than paper money. There are still a lot of people in the world who thinks Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will diminish after a few years and stick to what they were used to which is I think understandable. You can't really please everyone because they have their own opinions regarding the digital currencies.