You will really need to be patient, legacy address will make the transaction longer to be confirmed
That's not true when using the same number of sats/(v)byte.
I know this is left to you as you are better in this far more than me, but using uncompressed legacy address this time really sounds like a joke for professional like you.
Sometimes using
a funny address is just worth the extra transaction fees.
are you using the new versions of electrum or the old ones?
I used Electrum 4.0.9.
if you shared the transaction (or maybe another one on testnet that looks like it if privacy is a concern) it could be analyzed better.
The address is publicly known already.
the only time the size is changed is when the signatures you produce end up needing an additional 00 at the beginning of their r value when they are encoded. depending on number of signatures this could increase but i don't think enough to decrease the fee by 1 sat/byte.
Isn't it just because the signature part makes the transaction larger?