Obviously I grow over time what does that have to do with anything.
The only reason that I did not say Legendary member/staff status as there are only a limited number of those. PD is too old and too good for seniors to be allowed in it.
Keep in mind that Stunna did not listen to me in time, nor did other campaign owners. What was the result? A ton of spam. So I was right.

Here's an example:
It seems to me like people are trying to act smart, rather than suggesting something that actually makes any sense for the campaign.

I'm not trying to act smart, I merely suggested an additional option that Stunna could still control quite well.

Edit: Forgetting Stunnas idea for a minute, mine makes sense and saves him BTC since lets say there was a set fee of 0.15 or 0.2. Well, under Stunnas idea if implemented, someone who somehow actually makes lets say 600 constructive posts would take him for  0.36 BTC.

It amazes me how concerned people get over these campaigns! At the end of the day we get mere pocket change for doing something we are supposed to be doing for free. I join these myself for the free coins, but I wouldn't be upset if signature campaigns were banned since it creates spam. PD had a great campaign, but the spam was ridiculous.

In all honesty if it comes back great and if not I keep my sig the way it is. I'm not overly concerned one way other the other. I was just trying to say if it does come back that I would like to maybe see a fixed rate as well. Either way I'm happy with the way things are now pocket change or not.

A fixed rate for all the rank (SrHero&LegendaryStaff) ?  Yeah maybe it will a good idea .... now we have only to wait a reply from Stunna.

While it should create a lot less spam, the cost per impression would be higher for Stunna.

Those existing campaigns pay about 0.1 btc for 50 posts, and so Stunna will probably need to pay the same rate as well (=0.002 per post if everyone make exactly 50 posts), which will be a lot higher than Stunna 0.0006 per post rate in his mind. 
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/291387.msg9291093#msg9291093

I think Stunna can Always expect some degree of spam non-constructive posts if a pay-per-post method is used.  I don't think 0.0006 BTC per post is a bad reward IF there are no limits. This means that this can be a great campaign for those senior and hero members that do post a lot (constructive) posts on this forum. For people which are not that active, there are better solutions, as there are also other parties which pay out more than. These might have more restrictions though, and might pay out for example max 0.01 BTC or so (for a minimum required post count of 10, or nothing as Bitmixer is doing now).

U must have just upgraded because your Jr. Member now. Regardless of what Stunna does if anything I'm sure he will make it fair for all with maybe keeping newbs out or something.

Actually I guess thinking about it 4X might not be a bad deal
Since 0.12 for 50 or 0.12 at 200 with an unlimited cap means that a 400 post average user gets to 0.24 a month for 8 X the posts not particularly impossible to attain and be constructive and easy as heck to monitor from a spam viewpoint.
The member level tiers might be an issue though but I can see everyones occam razor argument simpler and what not makes sense.

Interesting discussion anyways do change my models up now and then but people do think of other interesting ones.

The reason I say you are being selfish is because you are asking for a rule that will allow a very limited number of potential participants. If there are a small number of potential participants then Stunna will need to offer a much higher rate in order to get a lot of people to join his campaign.

A fixed rate deal would not do anything to stop spamming. If the campaign were to payout .1 for 50 posts then people would try to quickly spam their way to 50 posts on one account, then use a 2nd account to spam their way to 50 posts, and continue this process until they either run out of accounts or the payment period is up. This means that if an account gets banned for spamming on a fixed rate deal, they still potentially can use other accounts to spam (assuming they do not mind risking getting caught ban evading), where as if the campaign operates on a pay per post structure then a user will have less of an incentive to have multiple accounts and if their "spam" account gets banned then they can no longer spam.