IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.
Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.
Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.
Perhaps trust could come to those who have long periods of service to PrimeDice?
After all, that would not just demonstrate loyalty, but rather it would demonstrate that they are contributors to the Bitcointalk community with no flagged post abuse.
It's not a biggie, but it was nice having some trust acknowledgement
