There should be some conditions, like "minimum 2 lines, xx chars, xx words".
Otherwise, it would be really difficult to consider it "spam" or not
Completely agree. However atm I believe he uses a system of how many times your posts were quoted to judge their worth, and that is retarded. For example, say i posted aggravating comments and remarks which are more likely to make the other party quote me.
I completely dissagree. In my opinion, spam is not by the quantity postly, but rather the quality of the post.
Making certain restrictions would force others to make their thoughts longer when it's obviously a short one.
I do agree on making certain guidelines on what and how much to post, which Stunna has kind of implemented already.
I think the length basis for the whole spam/no spam thing is stupid, because thoughts can be conveyed in a succinct manner, and stupidity can ramble on forever.
