@ Micro not really a complaint
But is that list comprehensive swear I filled in the form already so wanted to check

That said nice work that looks like a long list to filter out lol.

He's the moderator on the Primedice chat box
Not sure if Stunna gave him the task of checking the signature campaigns as well but it is nice to see a list of registered users

Edit in:
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/291387.msg7911411#msg7911411

^_^ checked his posts

What is this Primedice chat box ? Now chats have mods too !!!

These mods will not be in PD3 because this new version have some better offers just wait for some time 

Working through these now, a lot of help was provided from Micro with his thread on services.

I will be denying certain users payment, I'd like to ask you all if I am acting justly in doing so.

Here are some of the users who will be denied:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=310214

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=28364

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=105473

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152305

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=152501

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244243

Please review these and let me know if I am being fair when I say they do not deserve payment. This is obviously a very small % of the people in the campaign, compared to prior months the amount of abuse/spam has decreased significantly.


On top of that thanks to the form I was able to track users who changed their signature during the campaign to other campaigns to collect their payments.

One abuser was Skele (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=165337):

http://puu.sh/a1VGP/2493bf2b81.png   (Screenshot I took mid campaign)

He will be denied pay and left negative trust. He is currently listed as a campaign member of updownBT as well. I wanted to give Skele benefit of the doubt and figured it was possible he just switched between campaigns and accurately reported his post count but he is reporting a starting post count even lower than what we have recorded and his current 654 which means he is counting the posts from both campaigns and cheating myself and updown and has been doing this for months likely. Next month I will be checking more often, I only did one check for this type of abuse.

Looks like a good list and a fair list of eliminations in my opinion, just this one perhaps.
Looks like an avid soccer fan to me more or less but it really depends on how many posts they claimed were constructive that said I agree with micros opinion that there are far to many one liners in there.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244243 - CHECK way to much nonsense one liners if ok needs to deduct alot

The issue is off-topic posts are not counted, almost all of his posts are off-topic.

Ah that makes sense your right a lot of off-topic posts should not count since a user needs to have more variety and participation in all parts of the forum
Thanks for clarifying and props to Micro for his efforts

But off topic posts are even against rules of this forum. Ok they did not have all non constructive posts , that is why i put CHECK on them, but its big % of posts , and i highly dought they deducted more than maybe 5-10% of posts , so its kinda attempt to scam .

But again would be nice to hear some others opinions on it. Just to be fair as possible.

Posts in off topic section are fine as long as they are on topic there. But posts that are off topic in specific thread , that posts are against rules and ofc should be deducted. Problem is when 50+% of ur posts are off topic and not constructive , and u deduct only about 5-10% or less.

Some people deduct like 10-15 posts and think they are fine while in reality its way more .