<<  >> (p.2)
    Author Topic: Claymore's NeoScrypt AMD GPU Miner v1.2 (Windows)  (Read 32855 times)
    This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.

    • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 02:45:22 PM
     #21
    Quote from: phuocduong on February 24, 2018, 02:33:12 PM
    wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?

    I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • Vann
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1036
    Merit: 606



    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 02:45:43 PM
     #22
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 02:43:37 PM
    Quote from: santan on February 24, 2018, 02:40:24 PM
    Please Also think about us........ NVIDIA miners.......
    Earlier yours Zcash was also AMD only....

    Both my ZCash and Neoscrypt miners will be AMD-only, sorry.
    There are many NVIDIA devs here and they already released appropriate miners.

    Your miners are the best out there. Keep up the good work. Smiley

  • fr4nkthetank
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 2294
    Merit: 1182


    Now the money is free, and so the people will be


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 03:16:03 PM
     #23
    Ok testing with vega 56.  It really seems to be a power limit problem.  With no real tweaking, just power limit on a stock 56 GPU, I get.

    190w -19pl, 1300
    235w 0pl, 1450

    So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage.  This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 03:23:25 PM
    Last edit: February 24, 2018, 03:34:13 PM by Claymore
     #24
    Quote from: fr4nkthetank on February 24, 2018, 03:16:03 PM
    Ok testing with vega 56.  It really seems to be a power limit problem.  With no real tweaking, just power limit on a stock 56 GPU, I get.
    190w -19pl, 1300
    235w 0pl, 1450
    So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage.  This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.

    Agreed, my watercooled Vega64 at stock clocks takes 500W to show 2200KH/s, it's crazy. Though it takes similar power in dual mining too.
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • woodaxe
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 129
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 03:36:39 PM
     #25
    2x sapphire nitro rx vega 56

     160watts at wall  1500k/hs  -19 pl stock clocks

    im told the fan on the standard vega pulls 30watts on its own

    the nitro has 3 fans and its hardly hitting 50c

    sapphire rx560  391 k/hs  not sure of wattage atm

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 03:40:41 PM
     #26
    Anyway, now AMD is not worse than NVIDIA in NeoScrypt mining, let me know if you can get 2200KH/s from single 1080Ti Smiley
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • Bare
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 130
    Merit: 11


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 03:54:22 PM
     #27
    Did anyone test how much undervolt is possible going from stock card settings for stable mining for any of these cards for neoscrypt?

  • dragonmike
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1274
    Merit: 556



    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 04:20:28 PM
    Last edit: February 24, 2018, 05:08:13 PM by dragonmike
     #28
    It'd be interesting when we get more data from users here, especially when it comes to optimal clocks to use.
    Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.

    EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?

  • alucard20724
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 704
    Merit: 272


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 04:44:29 PM
     #29
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 02:45:22 PM
    Quote from: phuocduong on February 24, 2018, 02:33:12 PM
    wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?

    I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.

    I'm running drivers 18.2.2 with my 570/580 cards.   the -powlim 50 option doesn't seem to work

    "Failed to set new Power Control treshold for GPU #0"  .. that's exactly the message i get... spelling error and all.

  • Claymore (OP)
    Donator
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1610
    Merit: 1325

    Miners developer


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 05:16:51 PM
     #30
    Quote from: dragonmike on February 24, 2018, 04:20:28 PM
    It'd be interesting when we get more data from users here, especially when it comes to optimal clocks to use.
    Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.

    EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?

    No, I use stock clocks in my tests.

    Quote from: alucard20724 on February 24, 2018, 04:44:29 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 02:45:22 PM
    Quote from: phuocduong on February 24, 2018, 02:33:12 PM
    wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?

    I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.

    I'm running drivers 18.2.2 with my 570/580 cards.   the -powlim 50 option doesn't seem to work

    "Failed to set new Power Control treshold for GPU #0"  .. that's exactly the message i get... spelling error and all.

    I use 18.2.2 and -powlim works fine with my RX580. Anyway, you can try to use AB to set power limit.
    Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
    List of my miners: https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/3019607

  • peterboy1
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 168
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 05:54:02 PM
     #31
    wow. this is great. i hope for more algos from you in preparation to these asics and pos thingies.

  • alucard20724
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 704
    Merit: 272


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 06:23:18 PM
     #32
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 05:16:51 PM
    Quote from: dragonmike on February 24, 2018, 04:20:28 PM
    It'd be interesting when we get more data from users here, especially when it comes to optimal clocks to use.
    Personally I'm trying this on my Vega56@64 rig. At -25 PL and Cryptonight clocks (1408/1115) hashrate is approx 1550Mh/s per card (using blockchain driver). The whole rig is drawing ~1450W at the wall in the process. No idea how stable that is in the long run.

    EDIT: Claymore, have you experimented with clocks at all? Any approximate sweet spots you can advise?

    No, I use stock clocks in my tests.

    Quote from: alucard20724 on February 24, 2018, 04:44:29 PM
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 02:45:22 PM
    Quote from: phuocduong on February 24, 2018, 02:33:12 PM
    wow, wonderful, RX470 speed?

    I get 900KH/s on stock "RX470 red devil" card with "-powlim 50 -a 2" options.

    I'm running drivers 18.2.2 with my 570/580 cards.   the -powlim 50 option doesn't seem to work

    "Failed to set new Power Control treshold for GPU #0"  .. that's exactly the message i get... spelling error and all.

    I use 18.2.2 and -powlim works fine with my RX580. Anyway, you can try to use AB to set power limit.

    Thanks for your help.  Figured it out afterwards.  the problem wasn't your code, nor AB.  my one 580 is an OC version and it's power limit is coded to be 30 max.  setting -powlim to 30 or less worked fine.

  • ccminer.net
    Sr. Member
    ****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 595
    Merit: 251


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 07:25:01 PM
     #33
    nice!!!
    More algos for the best miner around!!
    Congrats Claymore for the good job!!

  • Marvell2
    Full Member
    ***
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1148
    Merit: 132


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 07:50:19 PM
     #34
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 03:23:25 PM
    Quote from: fr4nkthetank on February 24, 2018, 03:16:03 PM
    Ok testing with vega 56.  It really seems to be a power limit problem.  With no real tweaking, just power limit on a stock 56 GPU, I get.
    190w -19pl, 1300
    235w 0pl, 1450
    So, yes PL + 50 will get you good speed...but at an ridiculous power usage.  This is stock 56 though, not soft modded.

    Agreed, my watercooled Vega64 at stock clocks takes 500W to show 2200KH/s, it's crazy. Though it takes similar power in dual mining too.

    vega has to be softmodded with power play table mod to reduce power or itsa hog

    all my vega 56 and frontier cards are softmodded and do 40mhs eth 2500 blake at around 200ish watts

    Not tried neoscrypt yet tho with this new miner

  • rednoW
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1510
    Merit: 1003


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 09:00:08 PM
     #35
    Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
    vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
    Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
    Good work, Claymore! ))

  • cirlama
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 156
    Merit: 1


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 09:13:28 PM
     #36
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 03:40:41 PM
    Anyway, now AMD is not worse than NVIDIA in NeoScrypt mining, let me know if you can get 2200KH/s from single 1080Ti Smiley

    we are not far away, my 1080 ti gives 2000+ with latest excavator and just below 2000 with modified hsr...

    nevertheless, it's good to have a decent amd neoscrypt miner, thanks
    (I have different brands & models of cards, more fun....)

  • sir_blacks
    Jr. Member
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 119
    Merit: 3


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 09:22:09 PM
     #37
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 02:43:37 PM
    Quote from: santan on February 24, 2018, 02:40:24 PM
    Please Also think about us........ NVIDIA miners.......
    Earlier yours Zcash was also AMD only....

    Both my ZCash and Neoscrypt miners will be AMD-only, sorry.
    There are many NVIDIA devs here and they already released appropriate miners.

    come one mate because there are other miner out there not means equality is same, plus more choise always is better & it can create a good dev competition my be in a pozitive way ... personal after i was use your Eth one damn i can say i wish you to change your mind & make Zcash & this new Neoscrypt supporting Nvidia to

    but probabil maintain AMD & Nvidia on same equality is not easy task ...

    anyway hope to change your mind & make a lot ppls happy

    Cheers & thx

  • dragonmike
    Hero Member
    *****
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1274
    Merit: 556



    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 09:27:09 PM
     #38
    Quote from: rednoW on February 24, 2018, 09:00:08 PM
    Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
    vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
    Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
    Good work, Claymore! ))
    That sounds quite good. Would you mind sharing your overdriventool settings?
    I am limited by my PSU (EVGA 1600 G2) to run these speeds but maybe I could get somewhat closer with some tweaking. These are my settings (although they won't mean much if I gimp them with -25 PL...

    Name=Vega64b
    GPU_P0=852;900
    GPU_P1=991;900
    GPU_P2=1084;900
    GPU_P3=1138;900
    GPU_P4=1150;900
    GPU_P5=1202;900
    GPU_P6=1212;900
    GPU_P7=1408;905
    Mem_P0=167;900
    Mem_P1=500;900
    Mem_P2=800;950
    Mem_P3=1115;1000
    Fan_Min=3600
    Fan_Max=4900
    Fan_Target=75
    Fan_Acoustic=2400
    Power_Temp=85
    Power_Target=0

  • rednoW
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 1510
    Merit: 1003


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 09:34:44 PM
     #39
    Quote from: dragonmike on February 24, 2018, 09:27:09 PM
    Quote from: rednoW on February 24, 2018, 09:00:08 PM
    Just tried this with my 2 vega64 and 1 vega56, xmr-based setup 1408/1150@900mV
    vega64 is 2.1 mhs neoscrypt each card, vega56 is 1.9mhs.
    Delta between idle and mining modes for 3 cards is ~750watt, so ~250 watt per card.
    Good work, Claymore! ))
    That sounds quite good. Would you mind sharing your overdriventool settings?
    I am limited by my PSU (EVGA 1600 G2) to run these speeds but maybe I could get somewhat closer with some tweaking. These are my settings (although they won't mean much if I gimp them with -25 PL...

    I posted my reg-file some time ago in vega thread, don't want to repeat. You can find it ...
    I use old 23Aug blockchain driver.
    I never use PL for downvolting, only p-states.

    In your example I don't like 950 and 1000 mV settings for memory, they shoud be the same with corresponding P7-state (900 or 905 mV)

  • MetalHelmet
    Newbie
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 74
    Merit: 0


    View Profile
    February 24, 2018, 10:34:46 PM
     #40
    Quote from: Claymore on February 24, 2018, 02:16:32 PM
    Oh, if you calculate the increased difficulty that will come, the only choice is ETH of course Smiley It seems I just waste my time with new miners...
    Don't think so...
    1. Nicehash will add this miner for sure - and on some spikes of high demand for Neoscrypt Nicehash Legacy miner will switch even "reds" to this algo (using your new miner which gives comparable hashrate )...
    2. Autoswitch beatween algos on Miningpoolhub with  also can use it
    3. ETH -> POS , miners goes to ETC Pirl ... and diff rise - so some of them will go to Neoscrypt in search of better profit


    Anyway - new decent miner on "non-red's" algo - is a good job.
    Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 »  All
      Print  
Page 1
Viewing Page: 2

IRLBTC™ © 2025 IRLBTC.com