Meh, bitcoin critics just don't like anything new or crazy.
No, it goes deeper than that. Imagine a world where everyone could at will summon a forcefield which made it impossible to exert violence to coerce them. Instantly all economic transactions would become voluntary. This would radically change the world from its current state where a large degree of economic transactions involve an element of coercion. Gold and silver have traditionally performed this role in society as an
essential check and balance in the political machinery because of their intrinsic value and privacy.
The great Austrian school of economics economist
Ludwig von Mises phrased itIt is impossible to grasp the meaning of the idea of sound money if one does not realize that it was devised as an instrument for the protection of civil liberties against despotic inroads on the part of governments. Ideologically it belongs in the same class with political constitutions and bills of rights.
Dr. Edwin Vieira, who holds four degrees from Harvard and practices law before the United States Supreme Court phrased it
Thus, the fight over gold and silver as media of exchange is about more than mere money, let alone making money. For it is a fight with only two possible outcomes: either control of their own lives by the people themselves, or control of the people and their lives by political and economic elitists.
The State is an organization of force and force is violence. BitCoin strikes directly at the heart of the State which is its ability to use violence to secure resources. Without that ability it becomes irrelevant. Thinking of the State as being irrelevant is like thinking in the 1500's that the Catholic Church would become irrelevant. But that is what BitCoin and tools like it have the potential to do and BitCoin critics rage against that idea because they hate to think that violence can no longer be employed profitably.