I think I watch too many detective TV shows, but I'm suspicious of recent HBN events.   Here are my 1 + 1,

First 1 is that an exchange with HBN was recently robbed
2nd  1 is HBN experienced a massive serge immediately followed by a moderate dump

the following is my '= 2' explained:

In the past when the thieves sold from exchanges they focused on BTC because it had enormous value, now that btc's value has dropped, and so many alts CCs are doing well the thieves are taking many other coins too.

Unlike btc, ltc, and doge that have so many buyers and sellers for the given supply, such can't really be said for the alts especially HBN, so when a small exchange is robbed and all of their HBNs are taken the thief runs to Cryptsy bids up the value then dumps the stolen good on unsuspecting buyers.  To make things worse some of the buyers are literally buying back their own CCs at a higher price than it was worth when it was stolen from them.


That's my 1 + 1 = 2 results, what do you think?

Even if the facts of the matter are wrong, the merits are sound as such things should be done to limit potential damage.  Here is my top suggestion, delist HBN from all exchanges except Cryptsy; only allow exchanges with a proven track record of responsible performance like Mintpal to list HBN, in this way the above scenerio has less of a chance of effecting HBN.

I really don't think that is what is going on. For one thing, if you go back and look through the HBN threads, long before those coins were stolen, people were commenting on how there was very little sell pressure/momentum for HBN. People just aren't selling it cheap and they never have been. Probably has a lot to do with the whole 100% stake feature, look at the other POS coins that have come out since. Mint offers 20%, and now whitecoin 2% what is that bullshit? HBN was also early to the party, so they got established before the wave of 1000 shitcoins really got started.

hbn to the mooon

Likely no. The wallet will try to resend again randomly here soon enough.   If after a few hours you still don't have any confirmations you can try to run checkwallet, or perhaps start with -rescan a final method would be to try -salvagewallet. One of these should work.

I'm new to POS (and next to zero research) but wouldn't the interest to to the address holding the coins in the wallet?

This could be done, but it would require a good deal of book keeping.

Additionally to gain interest those coins would need to sit on the network hot, and use up CPU power, taking away from deposits/withdraws.  There is risk to an exchange doing this, as such I would guess the majority of the coins are in cold storage, and those that are hot, are set with -reserveblance=999999999

Wow HBN is the 8th most traded on cryptsy in the last 24 hours.

I was trying those commands but had no sense of if they were working, I was about to post again in this thread as I didnt think they worked after about an hour, then after going downstairs(20 minutes) something happened because when I came back It had its first few confirmations . I also tried the resendtx command(wasn't sure if I needed to add the tx number to the command aswell) but wasnt sure if there was any effect. Thanks for the help

I remember the times when NVC users at BTC-E had issues with deposits and withdrawals coins to/from exchange for several days.
As it turned out, the exchange is for real used its wallet for staking, and when too many inputs were originated (and many unconfirmed stakes, nvc uses 520 confirms for newly minted coins), the exchange's wallet started being laggy.

So, eventually, after consultations with Balthazar, they turned off staking on the exchange to avoid such problems.

QMAKE_CXXFLAGS in the .pro file.
btw. I haveusr/bin/gcc which is symlink to gcc.sh, where I have
and similarly for g++ → g++.sh

when installing new gcc, I run newgcc.sh inusr/bin  dir: