>> (p.1)
    Author Topic: I was asked a tough question, who can help me answer?  (Read 6395 times)
    nakowa (OP)
    Member
    **
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 83
    Merit: 10


    View Profile
    July 21, 2011, 09:15:04 AM
    Last edit: July 22, 2011, 01:54:07 AM by nakowa
     #1

    If Bitcoin is a currency with deflation property, that means BTC has to be appreciated (which in reality means BTC is a fancy collectible)

    Therefore a rational BTC user will hold BTC rather than spend it.

    but if no one spend BTC, then what's the point of such a currency?

    ================

    who can help me find out the fallacies in this reasoning? thank you!

    ================

    Edited 22nd, July, 2011:

    Summary from responds to this post:

    1. History has proved that such a senario didn't emerge that most users hold BTC rather and spend.
    2. The definition of "rational" varies from individual to individual. Holding might well be rational for some, while spending is rational for others.
    3. Let we assume bitcoin is deflationary. However, not everyone is 100 percent confident on the outcome of this assumption. Theoretically, only those who have 100 percent confidence will "rationally" choose to hold rather than spend.
    4. Like any other products, the market price of BTC and the true value of BTC don't always meet, and deviation always exists, which always attracts speculators. A "rational" speculator's choice would be to gain as much as possible through buying and selling along with up and down waves.
    5. Holding forever is meaningless. Money (including bitcoin) itself represents nothing, only when it's spent the value realizes. Nearly none of us is willing to holding money forever.
    6. Before 2133, bitcoin is in fact not deflationary, since before that time, the amount of BTC circulated has been increasing. At current period, bitcoin is in effect an inflationary currency.

Page 1
Viewing Page: 1