maximum what you can
get expect in row on 49.50%(2x payout with 1% HE) is something around +/- 35

There... fixed that for you.
Theoretically, the maximum number of losses in a row that you can
get is infinite. Given each "roll" is independent from any prior rolls... your chance is still 49.5% every roll. I'm sure there will be someone that will one day break all known "records" and get some ridiculous run of like 50 losses.
RNG have "memory" thats why you have near 100% correct "luck" numbers after X bets on X fixed winning chance %. each play percentage has own maximum possibility deviations from the norm.
thats why you can't get 100 reds in row on 49.50%, but can get 1500 reds in row on 1%
how long time dice game is in industry? 4-5 years? (i dont know) ask yourself why there is no fixed proof about someone who was get 35+ streak on that 2x payout(with 1% HE and trusted site) after that kind of time?
because no one had it.i can write every forum, and tell that i was get 60reds in row, and from this moment all will trust that is a "Record"? I even can make screenshot in photoshop, and? its stupid to trust every thing what you can read somewhere

RNG have memory how?
every roll is independent,at least if the provably fair implmentation is correct and the game is not rigged
theoretically if a million monkeys type on million pc's for infinite time,you can get 100 reds in a row,no problem,the only thing is when
also you can get much more than 1500 reds on 1%,I use the rule of 13x thumbs to simplify
its 13x your multiplier,starting from 2x to determine the minimum amount of reds you should be able to cover with your bank for a relatively safe martingale
p.s. I had 27 reds on 2x,but you won't trust me of course
