LOL...man, this guy is a piece of work. He doesn't think he should be required to refund anyone's money, even though they're delivering a year later than promised and the hardware they're delivering is less powerful and efficient than advertised. No, Mohammed...when you advertise a device at 50MH/s, that doesn't mean "after overclocking" unless you SPECIFICALLY define that in the advertising, which you didn't do. People were expecting a 50MH/s device that they could THEN overlock, potentially.
It blows my mind how sleazy this guy and his operation are.
I see your point but nah. If I'm correct they advertised a 5 Mh/s machine. Plus if you want to take legal action, you'd have to convince a judge that pre-ordering a machine that only existed in concept and getting something X times faster (and, absolutely, very late) is a breach of contract.
In the UK you have a right to a full refund any time up to 7 days after deliver. That right is absolute.
These guys tried to fight it, but have been getting their asses handed to them in court to this point.
I can't figure how anyone could not be demanding their $$$$ back as per consumer law. I pulled mine back almost a year ago now and it would seem there is still the option to file if people haven't already done so.
